Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08723-06
Original file (08723-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


LCC
Docket No. 8723-06
15 Mar 07

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1)      DD Form 149 w/attachments
         (2)      CMC ltr 1400/7 MI4PR—2, 28 Aug 06
         (3)      Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Gilbert, Wilcher, and Mr. Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUS ION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.










Docket No. 8723-06

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       Petitioner was promoted to paygrade E-5 effective on 1 October 2004, and for sergeant drill pay from 20 December 2004 until 15 July 2005.

b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS,
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.




15 March 2007















2
NJ

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09278-06

    Original file (09278-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUS IONUpon review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10287-06

    Original file (10287-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2 The Board, consisting of Mses. Gilbert, Humberd, and Mr. Dietrich, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00094-07

    Original file (00094-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant tQ the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 15 December 2003 to 14 May 2004, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.3. In enclosure (3), the HQMC Officer Counseling and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9483 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR9483 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the other than honorable (OTH) characterization of his discharge of 18 February 1972, be changed to general under honorable conditions. reviewed Petiti S allegations of error and Justice on 4 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08718-06

    Original file (08718-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09903-06

    Original file (09903-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s constructive service date of ENSIGN (01) was calculated under SECNAVINST 1120.5A of 14 May 1986 vice OPNAVINST 1120.11 of 29 December 2005.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Goldsmith, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09904-06

    Original file (09904-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s constructive service date of ENSIGN (01) was calculated under SECNAVINST 1120.5A of 14 May 1986 vice OPNAVINST 1120.11 of 29 December 2005.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Goldsmith, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09901-06

    Original file (09901-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s constructive service date of ENSIGN (01) was calculated under SECNAVINST 1120.5A of 14 May 1986 vice OPNAVINST 1120.11 of 29 December 2005.2. Petitioner’s constructive date of rank as ENSIGN is 12 September 2002.c. Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09790-06

    Original file (09790-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record .be corrected to show that Petitioner’s constructive service date of ENSIGN (01) was calculated under SECNAVINST l120.5A of 14 May 1986 vice OPNAVINSP 1120.11 of 29 December 2005.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Goldsmith, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09902-06

    Original file (09902-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s constructive service date of ENSIGN (01) was calculated under SECNAVINST ll2O.5A of 14 May 1986 vice OPNAVINST 1120.11 of 29 December 2005.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Goldsmith, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 May...