Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08620-06
Original file (08620-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 TRG
 Docket No: 8620-06
9 November 2006

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
You reenlisted in the Navy on 28 May 1985 after about eight years of honorable service on two prior enlistments. On 16 October 1986 and 10 November 1987 you received nonjudicial punishment for wrongful use of a controlled substance.
Based on the two instances of drug abuse, you were processed for an administrative discharge by reason of misconduct. In connection with this processing, you elected to waive the right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). After review, the separation authority directed discharge under other than honorable conditions and you were so discharged on 11 December 1987.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service and the passage of time since your last discharge was issued. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your multiple incidents of drug abuse. The Board also noted that you waived the right to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a better characterization of service. The Board concluded that the discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board believes that you are eligible for veterans benefits based on your prior honorable service. Therefore, if you have been denied benefits, you should appeal that denial under procedures established by the Department of Veterans Affairs.






It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,




W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07895-06

    Original file (07895-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 14 November 1985 you reenlisted in the Navy at age 27 after two periods of prior honorable service....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01033-10

    Original file (01033-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the reason or characterization of your discharge given your record of two NJP's, for drug abuse (use). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04375-06

    Original file (04375-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 16 January 1984 at age 18. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05026-06

    Original file (05026-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable -statutes, regulations, and policies. On 11 February 1987, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09659-09

    Original file (09659-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were counselled regarding this misconduct and advised that, although you were being retained, any further misconduct, especially drug related...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01931-10

    Original file (01931-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05250-07

    Original file (05250-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 9 July 1984 after more than seven years of active service on a prior...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06208-06

    Original file (06208-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 October 1986 you received NJP for missing movement, two instances of willful disobedience of a lawful order, and use of an unspecified controlled substance.On 3 November 1986 your commanding officer recommended you for an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Finally, there is no evidence in the record to show that you ever requested or were denied treatment for substance abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11112-07

    Original file (11112-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, it further noted that a reservist can be administratively separated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, such as in your case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06430-06

    Original file (06430-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 21 August 1985 you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 21 after being granted a pre-service drug...