Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07430-06
Original file (07430-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 DJC
 Docket No. 7430-06
21 December 2006
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/683 of 30 Nov 06
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.
2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 December 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUS ION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.



Docket No. 7430-06 RECONMENDAT ION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a.       The 24 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 15 September 2008, is null and void.
b.       The petitioner was discharged on 22 June 2006 and reenlisted, under the provisions of the STAR program, on 23 June 2006. The term is 6 years.
c.       The petitioner was advanced to Petty Officer Second Class, effective 23 June 2006.
d.       This change will entitle the member to a zone “A” SRB with an award level of 5.0 for NEC 3354. Remaining obligated service to 14 September 2008 will be deducted from SRB computation.
e.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HES S J III
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
         


21 December 2006        





                           W. DEAN PFEIFFER
 Executive Director



2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05325-06

    Original file (05325-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09761-06

    Original file (09761-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04531-06

    Original file (04531-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06247-06

    Original file (06247-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leernan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05443-06

    Original file (05443-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with an award level of 3.0 for the FC rating.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Beckett, and Mr. Dunn, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00270-07

    Original file (00270-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05840-06

    Original file (05840-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05125-06

    Original file (05125-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04289-06

    Original file (04289-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06536-06

    Original file (06536-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...