Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05608-06
Original file (05608-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 JRE
 Docket No. 05608-06
22 October 2007

Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command dated 21 August 2007, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

                                                               W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                           Executive Director
Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                                                      MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

                                                      5730
                                                                                                    Ser PERS-95/1769
                                                                                                   21 Aug 07
MEMORANDUM FOR   EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C)
Subj:    REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF

         Ref:     (a)      BUPERSINST       l001.39E
                  (b)      MILPERSMAN       6110-020
                  (c)      MILPERSMAN       1910-168
          (d) SECNAVINST 1770.3D
End:     (1) PERS-31L Memo 5420 PERS-31C of 10 Aug 07
1.       Enclosure (1) is forwarded with the following recommendations and comments regarding request for evaluation through the disability evaluation system (DES) for illnesses and injuries allegedly incurred while under reserve orders.
2.       References (a) through (c) provide guidance for the proper management of reservists who have non-reserve related medical conditions which might impact mobilization potential. Navy Operational Support Centers (NOSC) submit clinical information on personnel. Navy Personnel Command (NPC) assigns physical risk classifications based on the professional recommendations of Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED). These classifications include “A”, “B”, and “5”. Risk “5” indicates a Sailor has a medical condition which renders her not physically qualified for mobilization and retention. Sailors assigned risk “5” are given the options to request either discharge, retirement (if eligible) or review by the Physical Evaluation Board (PEE).
3.       In their request for a PEB Sailors indicate if they feel their conditions are Reserve service connected. Per reference (d), Sailors whose conditions are found to be Reserve service connected are processed for line of duty (LaD) benefits. Sailors who fail to respond or to provide information in a reasonable period of time are considered to waive their rights.



Subj:    REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF

4.       Review of available records indicates on 25 March 2005 , NOSC Wilmington submitted clinical information on for physical risk classification assignment. On 6 July 2005, NPC, based upon the recommendation of BUMED, found her not physically qualified for retention and assigned a physical risk “5” classification. NOSC Wilmington of her status and after a period of time, she decided to request review by the PEE. In her request, indicated she felt her conditions were reserve service related. Her request was forwarded through the LOD benefits issuing authority (BIA) for review. The BIA requested additional information from NOSC Wilmington to properly determine if the conditions were Reserve service related. O n numerous occasions NOSC Wilmington requested provide the information required. The BIA eventually returned the PEB request after five months due to
 failure to respond NOSC Wilmington subsequently at her expiration of obligated service (EOS) on 27 April 2006.
5.       PERS-95 cannot support request for relief. Although she felt her conditions were Reserve service related, she failed to provide the additional information which was requested. This failure was deemed to be a waiver of rights for LOD benefits and PEE review. She was properly discharged at her EOS.
6.       Additional questions may be directed to HMCM(SW/AW/FMF) at (901)874-4503 or DSN 882-4503.



Captain, U.S. Navy Reserve
Medical Status Review Officer
Navy Reserve Personnel
Management Division (PERS-495)








FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08538-06

    Original file (08538-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you underwent psychological evaluation on 20 May 2000. On 12 February 2004,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09307-07

    Original file (09307-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. iii and Messrs 3 re and " : peee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2008 and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A copy of enclosure (2) was sent to Petitioner on 13 March 2008 for her review and comment. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00156-01

    Original file (00156-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner again requested removal of both contested fitness reports. The Board finds that Petitioner ’s failures of selection for promotion should be removed. other informal statement by another female officer claiming gender bias and the aforementioned investigation by CINCPACFLT which substantiated Lieutenant Comman II that a Therefore, based on this "preponderan climate of gender bias and perhaps discrimination existed under I recommend the first fitness report in that reporting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3279 14

    Original file (NR3279 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Soe, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RES 2 cae i BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NPR03279-14 17 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: [REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06030-09

    Original file (06030-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    06030-09 n. On 30 May 2008, two days after failing the BCA portion of the PFA, Petitioner received another medical waiver. On 5 June 2009, Petitioner filed enclosure 1 with this Board requesting that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to E-6/AT1 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam, Cycle 199. w. By enclosure 3, Petitioner's command has commented that no relief is warranted for the following reasons: Petitioner was not within BCA standards and did not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301889

    Original file (ND1301889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 March 2012, Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERS 913) directed NOSC Houston to discharge the Applicant with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service for Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve with a Reenlistment Code of RE-4 (Not Recommended for Reenlistment) and a Separation Code of JHJ (No Board Entitlement). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00042-08

    Original file (00042-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 5420 OPNAV N135 12 JUN 08 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-31C) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05898-00

    Original file (05898-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (BUMED) that you It was the Naval In addition, the Board noted that as you did not have a remaining reserve obligation The Board noted that a determination of your fitness for duty and entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy is under the cognizance of Disability Evaluation System (DES), rather than the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. case if the PEB had evaluated this member, she would have been found fit for continued active duty service. from active...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09248-06

    Original file (09248-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was promoted to commander at the 16 year point and was within the flow point guidelines.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00511-01

    Original file (00511-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 5 April, 23 July and 16 August 2001, copies of which are attached. The member requests the removal of the following fitness reports. performance and making recommendations concerning promotion and assignment are the responsibilities of the reporting senior.