Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05548-06
Original file (05548-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OFTHE NAVY
WI//     BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00




 DJC
 Docket No. 5548-06
          7 February 2007
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
 End:     (1)      DD Form 149 w/attachments
         (2)      NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/021 dtd 17 Jan 07
         (3)      Subject’s naval record

 1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify a reenlistment and an extension agreement.

2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

 a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.








Docket No. 5548-06
RECOMMENDATION:

 That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a.       The reenlistment executed on or about 6 November 2003 is for a term of 3 years, vice 6 years.
b.       The petitioner executed a 6 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 6 November 2006.
c.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder         Acting Recorder

 5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a). has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



 7 February 2007


















2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03667-06

    Original file (03667-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment and modify an extension agreement.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10177-06

    Original file (10177-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07399-06

    Original file (07399-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Hurnberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08812-06

    Original file (08812-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    8812-06 7 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10022-06

    Original file (10022-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10089-06

    Original file (10089-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Hurnberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09969-06

    Original file (09969-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    9969-06 7 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval RecordsTo: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07985-06

    Original file (07985-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    7985-067 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The reenlistment executed on or about 29 June 2001 is for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09414-06

    Original file (09414-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment and modify and extension agreement.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ivins, Ms. Guill, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04770-06

    Original file (04770-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    4770-0612 October 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL REORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MA rate.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms....