Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00983-06
Original file (00983-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2O37O - 51OO

                                             CRS
 Docket No: 983-06
6 June 2007









This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 May 2007. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. In this regard, the Board found that you were aware of the circumstances of your nonjudicial punishment, resignation, and separation on 30 April 1990, when you were discharged by reason of misconduct. It considers that date to be the date of discovery of the alleged errors and/or injustice in your record, rather than 15 November 2005, when you first reviewed a copy of your official military personnel file and determined that it is incomplete.
The Board cannot determine at this late date whether or not your OMPF was complete on 30 April 1990. It noted, however, that records pertinent to your request may have been archived by the Secretary of the Navy and/or Chief of Naval Personnel.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
          It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made. Sincerely,
                  Sincerely,

                   W. DEAN PFEIFFER                  Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11371-08

    Original file (11371-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, ‘xegulations and policies. The fact that the VA recently increased your disability rating to 30% is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record, because that rating was assigned because your condition had become more severe. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01116-07

    Original file (01116-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material Considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 12 May 1987 after four years of prior honorable service. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01944-07

    Original file (01944-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 3 October 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 4 March 1991, you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04203-07

    Original file (04203-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 18 July 1989, you reenlisted in the Navy at age 23 after a prior period of honorable service. On...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07030-06

    Original file (07030-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. discharged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05575-06

    Original file (05575-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 7 July 1989 after four years of prior honorable service. You served...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05567-06

    Original file (05567-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04319-06

    Original file (04319-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and Conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 September 1987 at age 18. The punishment imposed was a $500 forfeiture...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10056-06

    Original file (10056-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an other than honorable discharge and elected to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03443-07

    Original file (03443-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 February 1990 at age 20. Based on the information currently contained...