Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06051-05
Original file (06051-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

                                2 NAVY ANNEX
      WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100    CRS
            Docket No: 6051-05
            20 October 2005









   This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
   record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code
   section 1552.

   A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
   sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October
   2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
   accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to
   the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the
   Board consisted of your application, together with all material
   submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
   regulations and policies.

   After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
   Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish
   the existence of probable material error or injustice.

   The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 June 1999. The
   record reflects that on 25 June 2002 you were convicted by civil
   authorities of an unknown offense. The court sentenced you to a fine and
   court costs; and confinement for 30 days, which was suspended; and you
   were placed on probation for a year. On 20 November 2003 you received
   nonjudicial punishment for failure to obey a lawful order and adultery.

   On 22 November 2003 the commanding officer recommended that you be
   separated with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to
   commission of a serious offense. When informed of this recommendation,
   you elected to waive the right to submit a statement in response to the
   discharge action. After review by the discharge authority, the
   recommendation for separation was approved and on 23 December 2003 you
   received a general discharge by reason of misconduct. At that time, you
   were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.

   Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment
   code when an individual is discharged due to












misconduct. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your
situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment
of your reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or
reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by
applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may apply to NDRB
by submitting the attached DD Form 293.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable
action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep
in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

                                 Sincerely,






Enclosure























                                      2
)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00073-05

    Original file (00073-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07989-05

    Original file (07989-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03505-03

    Original file (03505-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 23 February 2001 you received a general discharge by reason of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02327-07

    Original file (02327-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 28 November 2000, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. On 27 January 2004, you were so discharged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05727-07

    Original file (05727-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedy of applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07937-02

    Original file (07937-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00762-10

    Original file (00762-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material Submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that you were fortunate to receive a general characterization of service, because individuals who are separated for misconduct such as yours normally receive an other than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00473-07

    Original file (00473-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 November 1999. After review by the discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02889-03

    Original file (02889-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 ~ p r i l 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 2 March 2002 you received a general discharge by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10406-02

    Original file (10406-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your applicati.on on 7 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.