Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01464-04
Original file (01464-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                     2 NAVY ANNEX
                                   WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100        

                                                                                          LCC:lc
                                                                                          Docket No: 1464-04
                                                                                          11 May 2004




Dear:

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 .
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 481 1A1, 19 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,


w. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
         MILLINGTON TN 33055-0000        

         1430
          Ser 4811A1/
         19 Apr 04

 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
          RECORDS (BCNR)
Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)
Subj:    COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF FORMER XXXX X. XXXX, USNR, XXXX
Ref:     (a) BUPERSINST 1430.16
End:     (1) BCNR file 01464-04
1.       Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned, recommending disapproval.

2.       Mr. XXXX is requesting advancement to Chief Pharmacists based on a letter of recommendation from his former Commanding Officer. There are no provisions in reference (a) to authorize a service member to be advanced in rate based on a recommendation alone. Unfortunately, a favorable endorsement cannot be granted regarding this petition without supporting documentation of actual advancement.



By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01502-04

    Original file (01502-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01188-04

    Original file (01188-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03177-06

    Original file (03177-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 1430 Ser 48llE9/375, 13 June 2006 and 11 December 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned with the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07000-03

    Original file (07000-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records s, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05364-06

    Original file (05364-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 481lE9/524, 16 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04773-04

    Original file (04773-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 481 1A1/305, 8 July 2004.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00879-06

    Original file (00879-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Member must pursue further advancement via the Navy Enlisted Advancement Sys tern (NEAS) , including Selection Board action, established in reference (a) -3. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05855-06

    Original file (05855-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02084-04

    Original file (02084-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06444-06

    Original file (06444-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.