Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07065-03
Original file (07065-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BJG
Docket No: 7065-03
28 August 2003

From:
To:

Subj 

:

Ref:

Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

USM
RD

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 dtd 23 Jun 03 w/attachments
w/encl
(2) HQMC MMER memo dtd 27 Aug 03 
(3) HQMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 21 
JulO3

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the original fitness report for 1 August 2001 to 21 June 2002, and
replacing it with a revised report for the same period, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at
(2), the Headquarters Marine Corps
Tabs A and B, respectively. As indicated in enclosure 
(HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board 
(PERB) has directed the requested correction
of Petitioner’s fitness report record. He further requested removal of his failure of selection
before the Fiscal Year 2004 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by
the selection board that next convenes to consider officers of his category for promotion to
the grade of lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed of selection to that grade.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Geisler and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2003, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the

. 

.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

In correspondence attached as enclosure 

(3), the HQMC office having cognizance

over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to strike his failure of selection for promotion
has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure 
following corrective action.

(3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s record be corrected so that he will be considered by the earliest

possible selection board convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to
lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed of selection for promotion to that grade.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board

recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner
that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

’s

’s record and

c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner

’s naval record be returned

to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner ’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

JONATHAN S. 
Acting Recorder

RUSKIN

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

--fnrPsni~r~~~~tion~~~~~~ut~~f-rpfPrPnrP

,

pp f wd *----

the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

%-

T&a

-W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2

AUG-27-2003 WED 

02:03

 PM

FAX NO,

DEPARTMENT  OF  THE NAVY

MEADQUARTERS  

UNlTEP 

Sl’ATE5  

MARINE  CORP

S

3280  RUSSELL

QUANTICO.  

vlt7cl~t~  

RDAD
 
28134-5103

REPLY  

riCFER  TO:

IM 
1610
MMER
27 

Aug 03

MFMOIVLNUUM  FOR THE EXECUTIVE 

DfRECTOR,  BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL 

RECORDS

Rubj:

Er1cl

:

YPLICATION IN TIIE 

SMC

CASE  OF' MAJOR

(I.) Copy of CMC 
(2) CMC Advisory Opinion 1610 MMOA-4 of 21 

MMER/PERB of 27 Aug 03

ltr 1610

Jul 03

.

We defer to 

As evidenced   by enclosure  

(l), PERB replaced
1.
fitness report for the period 20010801 to 200206
BCNR on the issue o
%I 3
for the removal of his failure of 
6
Lieutenant Colonel.
resolving that matter.
3. 
P1
provid
contained at enclosure 

ith enclosure 
(l), this Headquarters
ith a copy of the Advisory Opinion
(2),

Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in

&ad, Performance Evaluation
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
Commandant
By direction of the
of the Marine Corps

FAX NO,

DEPARTMENT 
HCADQUARtERS  UNITED

Or THE; NAVY
S+ATES 
 
M*Rl? ‘iL 

CORFD

3280 
QUANTICO,  

lius3l!Ll. 

VlliGtNlh  

IlOAP
22134.5  

103

REFER+ ‘+-‘:

dEPL,Y 

1N 
1610
MMER/YERH
AU0 2 7 
2003

Subj :

Rci? 

:

Uucl 

:

COHRECTION  

OF 

NAVAIi RECORD

(a) 
(1) 

16l.O.lLO

MC0 
Copy of CMC Advisory Opinion 3.600 

MMOA-4 of 

21 Jul. 03

mferenc~,
allegations of 

Raving reviewed 
 
ths following  

tha 
Per 
reviewed 

1. .
h

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 05489-04

    Original file (05489-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has modified the report as Petitioner requested. He also failed of selection before the FY 2003 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, however, he is not requesting removal of this failure of selection because the fitness report that includes the contested “Comparative Assessment” was not in his record for that promotion board.2. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03462-01

    Original file (03462-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    icial military record, (l), PERB removed from Lieutenant the fitness report for We defer to BCNR on the issue of Lieutenant Colone 2. request for the removal of his failure of selection to the grade of Colonel. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has the Performance Evaluation Review Board Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report 29 Aug 99 co1 980701 t0...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08728-01

    Original file (08728-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The contested fitness reports were not removed until after both of Petitioner failures of selection to lieutenant colonel. ’s C. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMOA4) has commented to the effect that Petitioner request to remove his FY 2002 failure of selection has merit and warrants favorable action. z's request for de of Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in selec By enclosure 3. with a copy of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07836-02

    Original file (07836-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner further requested removal of his failure of selection before (2), the Headquarters Marine 2. Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps HLIDqUARTtRS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY UNITE0 STATES ROA AUSSLLL VIRGINIA 22 3PBO PUANTICO, MARINE CORPS D 134.6 IO3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB AUG 2 9 2002 E'rom : TO: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11c Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05733-03

    Original file (05733-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    We defer to BCNR on the issue of Lieutenant Colonel request for the removal of her failure of selection to the grade of Lieutenant Colonel. we furnished her with a copy of the Advisory Opinion Head, performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY I i E A O Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D S T A T E S M A R I N E C O R P S 3280 R U S S E L L R O A D Q U A N T I C O . Per the reference, we reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05737-03

    Original file (05737-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect that this rcquest has merit and warrants favorable action.' Per the provisions of reference (b), the Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your naval record. His two fitness reports from this billet have relative values of 88.43 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04402-01

    Original file (04402-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 3 August 1995 to 31 May 1996, a copy of which is at Tab A. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07628-02

    Original file (07628-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2002 In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance C. over the subject matter of Petitioner ’s request to strike his failures of selection for promotion before the FY 2001 and 2002 CW04 Selection Boards has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action. ith Head, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps HEADQUART2RS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RUSSELL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05485-01

    Original file (05485-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS Y HEADQUARTERS 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 MMOA-4 10 Jul 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: (a) MMER Request of 09 Jul 01. in the case USMC Recommend approval of 1. of his failure of selection to Lieutenant Colonel. Lieutenant successfully petitioned the Performance Evaluation Review Board for removal of the Reviewing Officer co Transfer...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07185-01

    Original file (07185-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in By enclosure 3. a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained at enclosure (3), this Headquarters provided Majo ith Head, "Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 1610 MMER/PERB 23 kU6 20% From: Co To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11C MC 41 Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board 1. has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your...