Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04876-03
Original file (04876-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

HD:hd
Docket No: 04876-03
21 August 2003


From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1) DD Form 149 dtd 15 May 03 w/attachments
(2)      PERS-81 1A1 memo dtd 24 Jul 03
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks”) (NAVPERS
1070/6 13) entry and the service record page 4 (NAVPERS 1070/604) entry reflecting his
advancement to DC2. Copies of the contested entries are at Tab A.

2.       The Board, consisting of Mses. Davies and Moidel and Mr. Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2003, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office with cognizance over the subject matter of this case has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants favorable action.





CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a.       That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks”) (NAVPERS 1070/6 13) entry and the service record page 4 (NAVPERS 1070/604) entry reflecting his advancement to DC2.

b.       That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c.       That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an appropriate location in Petitioner’s naval record, and that another copy of this report be returned to this Board, together with any material directed to be removed from Petitioner’s record, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN                                   JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder                                                      Acting Recorder



5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.






2

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
         MILLINOTON TN 35055-0000

                 
1430
         Ser 811A1/~16
         24 Jul 03


MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

         Subj:

Ref:     (a) BUPERSINST l430.l6E

End:     (1) BCNR file

1.       Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a),enclosure (1) is returned recommending approval.

2. Based on a review Petty Officer XXXX master record there is no evidence that he was ever a rated Damage Controlman. It is recommended that the original NAVPERS 1070/604 and NAVPERS 1070/613 listing his advancement to DC2 be purged from his record.




By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03633-05

    Original file (03633-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 13 (“Administrative Remarks”) reflecting two entries dated 21 June 1996; the Commanding Officer,. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Koman and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 September 2005, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07981-02

    Original file (07981-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    07981-02 18 August 2003 Sub j : -USMCR, - From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Commandant, United States Marine Corps REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Enclosure BRIAN J. GEORGE By direction DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 BJG Docket No: 7981-02 18 August 2003 From: To: Subj : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy s o Y l l l s l l J E...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03466-03

    Original file (03466-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the OPNAV 5350-2 Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report (DAAR) dated 17 November 1992, concerning drug screening. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Geisler and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2003, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08720-00

    Original file (08720-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing a service record page 11 ( “Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 31 July 1992. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) “) counseling entry dated 31 July 1992. corrective action by this Headquarters...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05034-03

    Original file (05034-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lb ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 8 November 2000. application with supporting documents 2. As stated in paragraph 2 above, counseling is a leadership tool commanders have to improve their Marines' performance, however, Sergea that was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3524 13

    Original file (NR3524 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. In enclosure (8), MIQ commented to the effect that in light of enclosure (7), the contested BCP assignment and page 11 entries should be removed. of enclosures (5) and (8), the Board finds the existence of an error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12

    Original file (06982 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3835 14

    Original file (NR3835 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navat record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry Gated 6 November 2012 (copy at Tab A). he Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05454-02

    Original file (05454-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    application with supporting documents his for removal of the request 118(11) page 11 entry MC0 P1070.12K, Marine Corps Individual Records 2. fitness report that Staff Sergeant to provide counseling for personal and the a page 11 counseling should have no counseling is accomplished to overcome The event, were found in my record, The page 11 entry, not the iciencies. F 118(11) page 11 entry for removal Staff 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09991-02

    Original file (09991-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the PERSUPP DET (Personnel Support Detachment) Little Creek Virginia message 0813 15Z JUL 87, Subject: Rtn (return) Absentees ICO (in case of) Petitioner and. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Pfeiffer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20...