DEPARTMENT OF THE N VY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
t
2 NAVYANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 4659-03
14 August 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 August 2003. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
,
..
' , After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
' record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 27 July 1982 at age 20 and
reported for three years of active duty on 28 August 1982. The
record shows that you served without incident for over two years.
On 14 February 1985 you were convicted by civil authorities in
the United Kingdom of three instances of drunk driving and were
sentenced to 19 days in jail. You received nonjudicial
punishment on 17 April and 24 April 1985 for operating a motor
vehicle after being disqualified in the United Kingdom, and
- - - Q e r e l l ~ € f ; l o ~ o T ~ y - You were releasea -from active d ~ t 7 - T ~ UF ---
June 1985 with your service characterized as honorable. At that
time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned
an RE-4 reenlistment code. Subsequently, you received an
honorable discharge at the end of your military obligation.
-
ihe Board noted' that during the period from 14 February 1995
until your release from active duty on 10 June 1985, you had a
conviction by civil authorities which resulted in 19 days in jail
and two nonjudicial punishments. The Board concluded that this
record was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4
reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The.names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances ef your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely, .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01323-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2003. However, on 3 October 1985 you were dropped from this counseling due to your non-amenability to treatment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05617-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you were deemed to be financially irresponsible, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00580-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 23 February 1988 for three years. The Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code since you were treated no differently than others discharged under similar circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01986-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your civil conviction of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07788-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 8 January 1982 after four years of honorable service. On 20 March 1985,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00735-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. unanimously...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07488-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2002. Your record reflects that on 21 August 1982 you began a period of unauthorized absence (UA) that was not terminated until you were apprehended by civil authorities on 9 April 1985. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10961-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your frequent misconduct, which resulted in five NJPs and your lengthy period of UA which resulted in your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07954-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. In your case, the assignment of that code was also appropriate due to the civil conviction and two NJPs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02760-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A review of the 2. reas administrative portion of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning being arrested and charged with domestic violence and assault, not being recommended for promotion, and not being recommended for reenlistment because of commission of a serious...