MEH:ddj
Docket No:
24 June 2003
3035-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVALRECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref:
(a) Title 10 U.S.C.
1552
Encl:
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memorandum
(3) Subject ’s naval record
1160 Ser 8
1
l/265 of 2 1 May 2003
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(LSRB) for UIC 0763A.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper,
allegations of error and injustice on 24 June 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Dunne, and Tew, reviewed Petitioner ’s
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
(2), the Board finds the existence of an
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the
Docket No:
3035-03
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. The 30 month NAVPERS
28 February 2003, is null and void.
1070/621 extension agreement, operative date on or about
b. He was discharged on 13 January 2003 and reenlisted on 14 January 2003. The
term is 4 years.
The above changes will entitle petitioner to a zone
U&763A.
“A” LSRB, award level 1.0, for
d, That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
F---L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
r
24 June 2003
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02488-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone AC rating and a zone “B” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 66691. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Dunne, and Tew, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 24 June 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06497-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone (LSRB) for UIC 66691. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, McBride, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06495-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone (LSRB) for UIC 66691. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, McBride, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03374-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: mh Docket No: 3374-03 26 August 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00302-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UJC 66691.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Leeman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00045-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07791-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B3ARD FOR CORRECTIONOF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 779 l-02 10 December 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board Secretary of the r Correction of Naval Records 1160 Ser 81 l/455 of 12 November 2002 1. ns of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be ent to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus allegations of error and inj determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10774-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UJC 66691. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04235-04
The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the avialable evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09868-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to (LSRB) for UIC 0763A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cat-on, Lippolis, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...