DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No:
29 October 2003
2388-03
Your allegations of error and
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 October 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application,
together with all material submitted in support
thereof,
your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 1 October 1952 at age 17.
period from 24 June 1953 to 15 January 1954, you were convicted
by three special courts-martial.
periods of unauthorized absence totaling about 68 days.
special court-martial convened on 2 June 1954 and convicted you
of an unauthorized absence of about 38 days.
you to reduction to pay grade E-l,
month for three months,
months and a bad conduct
was issued on 2 September 1954.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
education.
cope with military life.
The Board found that these factors and
contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of
your discharge given the frequency of your unauthorized absences
and conviction by four special courts-martial.
concluded that the discharge was proper as issued and no change
is warranted.
A fourth
The court sentenced
confinement at hard labor for three
such as your youth and limited
that you were too immature to
forfeiture of $50 pay per
dis,charge.
The bad conduct discharge
Your offenses were three
During the
You contend, in effect,
The Board
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case
are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled
to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable
material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00382-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07106-06
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02104-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. A special court-martial convened on 9 August 1956 and convicted you of the foregoing period of unauthorized absence of about 76 The court days and missing ship's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08761-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07265-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The bad conduct discharge was issued on 4 April 1966.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08395-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct and especially the special court-martial conviction for 47 days of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07631-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 21 February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00494-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. conduct discharge was issued on 10 May 1963. confinement at hard labor for three The to forfeiture of $40 pay per On 2 April 1965 you elected The bad such as your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02299-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 11 January and 8 July 1944 you were convicted by a deck court and received nonjudicial punishment for two periods of unauthorized absence totaling...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06167-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences total-led more than six months. ...