Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02007-03
Original file (02007-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JRE
Docket No. 02007-03
29 August 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 August 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

and were found physically qualified for

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 12 June 1984.
You underwent a pre-separation physical examination on or about
16 July 1986,
separation.
reason of misconduct, with a discharge under other than
honorable conditions.
two nonjudicial punishments and a conviction by summary 
martial of multiple acts of misconduct.

The discharge was based on your record of
court-

You were separated from the Navy on 19 July 1986 by

The Board could not find any indication
that your misconduct was related to the
depression or glycogen storage disease,

in the available records
effects of undiagnosed
or that you were unfit

In addition, it
for service by reason of physical disability.
was not persuaded that your discharge by reason of misconduct
was erroneous or unjust.

In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

The

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
it is important to keep in mind that
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have

In this regard,

Sincerely,

Executive D



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08181-02

    Original file (08181-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 24 June 1986 you received a second NJP for use of marijuana, and were awarded restriction and extra duty, forfeitures of pay, and reduction to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01829-03

    Original file (01829-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 1 April 1986, the separation authority directed that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and that prior to discharge, you be offered drug rehabilitation treatment at a Veterans Administration (VA) facility. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02699-02

    Original file (02699-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when you received NJP for On 1 December 1986, you were evaluated to determine whether you were dependent on alcohol or drugs. and that it has been over 15 years However, the Board concluded that the NJP's for drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01323-03

    Original file (01323-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2003. However, on 3 October 1985 you were dropped from this counseling due to your non-amenability to treatment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02191-03

    Original file (02191-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00735-03

    Original file (00735-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. unanimously...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09385-02

    Original file (09385-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record contains a substance abuse report dated 26 March 1986 which noted that you were recommended for an administrative separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03149-08

    Original file (03149-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 10 December 1986, you were counseled regarding your unacceptable performance, psychiatric diagnosis, advised where assistance was available, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04606-02

    Original file (04606-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 29 November...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09354-02

    Original file (09354-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 November 1985 at age 18. On 10...