DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
FC
Docket No: 01141-03
16 June 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of t e
United States Code section 1552.
f your
Naval
Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 June 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
conFisted
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
The Board was unable to obtain your official record,
and conducted its review based on the copies of the record that
you submitted.
Documentary material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
(NJP) for failure to go to your appointed place of
On 6 April 1967 you reported to the Republic of
On 2 October 1968 you were awarded nonjudicial
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on,6 June
1966 at age 18.
Vietnam for duty.
punishment
duty and failure to obey a lawful order to report for
and were awarded a suspended reduction to
forfeiture of pay.
was vacated based on your failure to obey a lawful
in an off limits area of the Republic of Vietnam.
1969 you departed the Republic of Vietnam.
On 2 February 1969 the suspended pun'shment
paygrade E-3 a d a
meks duty,
order by being
On
11:March
:
On 26 September 1969 you were convicted by civil court of
embezzlement because of your failure to return a rental car to
its owner and were sentenced to pay the owner $2500 in monthly
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10044-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2007. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regarding your contentions, amnesty is not applicable in your case, and even though you were a sole surviving son, you voluntarily enlisted at the age of 17 with parental consent. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00095-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10416-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your frequent misconduct, and especially the repetitive and lengthy periods...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09492-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 8 June 1981 the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03539-01
You were again advanced to PFC and On 9 June 1969 you were The DD Form 214 shows that you had three periods of lost time, UA from 10 February to 10 March 1967 and two periods of confinement from 11 April to 12 June and 22 October to 21 December 1967. for entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal commenced on 26 October 1967, the day after your summary court-martial conviction. The DD Form 214 also indicates that eligibility Regulations provided that individuals discharged for the convenience of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02060-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04258-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. .Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04690-99
You were so discharged on 15 July The commanding officer noted In its review of your application the Board conducted a careful search of your service and medical records for any evidence showing you were wounded in action while serving in Vietnam. you were transferred from Vietnam, request to CMC to see if you were reported to have been wounded in action on 26 March 1966. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10982-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. As a result, on 27 January 1971, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05794-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. reduction to your third NJP for failure to obey a lawful order and were awarded a $20 forfeiture of pay, months, and confinement on bread and water for three days....