DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
JRE
Docket No: 960-03
3 June 2003
This is in reference to your request for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 May 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, it substantially concurred with the previous decisions of the
Board in your case of 13 April 1999, 13 February 2002, and 12 December 2002. It was not
persuaded that the misconduct which resulted in your discharge was related to the effects of
undiagnosed posttraumatic stress disorder. In addition, it concluded that your service was
appropriately characterized with an undesirable discharge, and that there is no basis for
upgrading that characterization. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a corrvtion of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEPFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00183-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00787-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02038-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In view of the above facts, there is no basis for expungement of his military record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06562-02
\ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 January 2002, the commanding officer recommended that you be honorably discharged by reason of your admission, and advised you of the right...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02090-03
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02889-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 ~ p r i l 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 2 March 2002 you received a general discharge by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10413-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for your separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge and Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03271-03
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 13 October 1995 you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02833-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.