DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
FC
Docket No: 00433-03
9 June 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 June 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 7 October 1998
at age 19.
On 14 May 1999, you received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for underage drinking and making a false official statement
by presenting a false identification card.
You were awarded a
forfeiture of pay, restriction, and extra duty.
On that same
day, you were counseled and about your substandard conduct and
advised that future misconduct could result in processing for
administrative separation.
counseled again about your substandard conduct.
On 6 June 2001,
you received a second NJP for failure to obey an order by wearing
a tongue ring while in uniform,
provoking speeches and gestures, and insubordination.
awarded restriction, extra duty, forfeitures of pay, and a
reduction to
On 16 December 2000, you were
paygrade E-3.
false official statements, use of
You were
On 18 June 2001, you were notified of administrative separation
processing and waived all of your procedural rights except the
right to obtain copies of documents supporting the basis for the
proposed separation.
discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious
offense.
On 5 July 2001, you received a general
However,
NJPs.
give]
the Board found that this factor was not
In its review of your case, the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
immaturity.
sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
the misconduct that resulted in two
Board noted that individuals separated for misconduct are
normally discharged under other than honorable conditions.
Therefore, you were fortunate to receive a general discharge.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
In this regard, the
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00537-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 10 May 2001 you submitted an appeal to The punishment imposed was a On 2 June 2001, your suspended separation action was vacated based on your continued misconduct, however, final action of the separation was held in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06323-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The reporting senior stated, in part, as follows: (Member) requires direct supervision to get satisfactory results.... he takes no ownership of any actions and constantly makes excuses for his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02255-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 19 January 1978, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a brief period of unauthorized absence and were awarded a forfeiture of pay, restriction, and extra duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09492-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 8 June 1981 the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10933-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04606-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 29 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01176-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted wa insufficient to ~tL DiIs]z the ~ist see f pm h 71 - m~teyi<i error o~ i~ Ustic&.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 April 1980 at age 19. On 3 February 1982 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07377-07
RDZ : ecbDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 June 1999 at age 18. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09354-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 November 1985 at age 18. On 10...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04683-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 23 June 1983 at age 18 and served without di~cip1inary incident until 2...