DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 348-03
4 February 2003
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Series of Documents
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting,
in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish
entitlement to a zone “B’ Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW
rating.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003
and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action
indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,
naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within
the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), Petitioner submitted
documentation showing that the request has merit and warrants favorable
action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially
in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of
an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Docket No: 348-03
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:
a. The reenlistment executed on or about 7 November 1997 is for a term
of 4 years, vice 6 years.
b. He was discharged on 6 November 2001 and reenlisted on 7 November
2001 (EAOS). The term is 6 years.
c. The above changes will entitle petitioner to a zone “B” SRB, award
level 3.5, for the ETSW rating.
d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s
naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN G. L. ADAMS
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
4 February 2003
W. DEAN PFIEFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06392-03
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments PERS memo 1160 Ser 81 Subject’s naval record l/481 dtd 9 Ott 2003 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, McBride, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10462-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating and advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06310-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02921-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01962-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04850-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum Sub_ject’s naval record (3) 1 160 Pers 81 1 of 2 October 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petition&, 1. in effect, that the applicable naval record filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. illjustice Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07991-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 7991-02 10 December 2002 From: To: urn 1160 Ser 81 l/452 of 13 November 2002 1. ched as enclosure titioner’s application has commented to the effect that the (2), the office having cognizance over the CONCLUSION Upon review and considerat.on of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01942-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1942-01 14 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10894-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04838-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...