DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
TJR
Docket No: 8634-01
24 May 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,
Section 1552.
sitting in executive session, considered your
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records,
application on 21 May 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.
together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record,
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
You enlisted in the Navy on 16 May 1962 at the age of 17.
Shortly thereafter, on 29 June 1962, you were convicted by
summary court-martial (SCM) of assault and were sentenced to hard
labor without confinement for eight days and a $20 forfeiture of
pay-
Your record reflects that on 25 May 1964 you received nonjudicial
punishment (NJP) for absence from your appointed place of duty
and were awarded restriction and extra duty for 30 days,
reduction to
16 September 1965 you received NJP for absence from your
appointed place of duty and disobedience.
was restriction and extra duty for
and a suspended forfeiture of pay. On
paygrade E-l,
The punishment imposed
14 days.
On 15 January 1966 you were convicted by SCM of a 38 day period
of unauthorized absence (UA) and missing the movement of your
ship.
confinement at hard labor for 30 days.
were notified of pending administrative separation action by
reason of unfitness due to your frequent military offenses. At
You were sentenced to an $80 forfeiture of pay and
On 24 January 1966 you
that time you waived your rights to consult with legal counsel
and to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
On 2 February 1966 the discharge authority directed an
undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness, and on 24 February
1966 you were so discharged.
in its review of your entire record and application,
The Board,
carefully considered all mitigating factors, such as your youth
and immaturity and your contention of prejudicial treatment.
Nevertheless,
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
because of your repetitive misconduct.
evidence in the record,
contention of prejudicial treatment.
application has been denied.
the Board found these factors and contention were
and you submitted none,
Accordingly, your
Further,
there is no
to support your
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard,
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
record,
existence of probable material error or injustice.
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
when applying for a correction of an official naval
it is important to keep in mind that a
You are entitled to have the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 November 1960 you received NJP for On 30 January 1961 you were convicted by convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of absence from your appointed place of duty and were sentenced to restriction and extra duty for 10 days and a $40 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11044-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 18 Nay 1960 at age 18. You were sentenced to confinement at hard...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05654-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Lou enlisted in he Navy on 14 August 1962 at age 18. On 18 February 1965 you submitted a written...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00214-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 13 October 2011. On 13 December 1961, you received NUP for three incidents of failure to go to your appointed place of duty. - Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05019-01
Your record reflects that on 22 September 1969 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a 25 day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded restriction for 14 days and a seven day forfeiture of pay. On 14 May 1973 you received an On 29 The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, limited education, low test scores, The Board further considered your and Vietnam service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02772-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. for 14 days and a $20 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02008-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 April 1962 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of absence from your appointed place of duty and sentenced to hard labor for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01099-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Na-1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband's naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 April 1969 the commanding officer recommended your husband be issued an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00113-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During the period from 15 December 1960 to 23 July 1962, you received three nonjudicial punishments (NJP’s) for two brief periods of UA...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03027-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to.warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three NUP’s and conviction by two SCM’s and one SPCM for serious misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...