DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
)ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No:
13 January 2003
08609-02
From:
To:
Chairman, Board
Secretary of the N
r Correction of Naval Records
‘Y
Subj:
Refi
Encl:
ICl
REVIEW OF NA
(a) Title 10
U.S.(
(1) DD Form
14s
. (2) PERS-663 me
(3) Subject’s nava
.td 18 Sep 02 w/attachments
odtd6Dec02
record
1. Pursuant to the provisi
filed enclosure (1) with thir
corrected by removing the
alleges to have been filled
I
(documents at issue not fou
field record). Copies of th
B of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
3oard requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
rogatory material relating to a positive random urinalysis she
t erroneously with her name and Social Security number
in Petitioner’s headquarters service record, but may be in her
1
documents in question are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.
2. The Board, consisting
injl
allegations of error and
determined that the correct
Docur
evidence of record.
enclosures, naval records,
;
Pfeiffer , reviewed Petitioner’s
Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and
ice on 9 January 2003, and pursuant to its regulations,
: action indicated below should be taken on the available
ntary material considered by the Board consisted of the ‘
d applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having rev
finds
of error and injustice,
wed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
.s follows:
a. Before applying to
lav
available under existing
tis Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
md regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence
having cognizance over the
th;
commented to the effect
tached as enclosure
rbject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has
her request has merit and warrants favorable action.
(2), the Navy Personnel Command office
,
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consider;
(2), 1
contents of enclosure
following corrective action
RECOMMENDATION:
ion of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
le Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
a. That Petitioner ’s
r
Report concerning an incid
oval record be corrected by removing the Drug and Alcohol Abuse
nt of 6 February 1992 (not in headquarters record).
b. That any material
correcl
recommendation be
that no such entries or mat
)r entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board
d, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner
rial be added to the record in the future.
’s
’s record and
c. That any material
to the Board, together with
confidential file maintained
Petitioner ’s naval record.
lirected to be removed from Petitioner ’s naval record be returned
a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
4. Pursuant to Section
6((
Records (32 Code of
Fedej
present at the Board ’s
revir
record of the Board ’s
proc
1 of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
II Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
w and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
edings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
delegal
5. Pursuant to the
the Board for Correction o
723.6(e)) and having assur
foregoing corrective action
the Board on behalf of the
I
JONATHAN S.
Acting Recorder
RUSKIN
on of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
d compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
secretary of the Navy.
EPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OMMAN D
PERSO NNEL C
NAVY
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
535 5
PERS-663
6
Dee 0 2
MEMORANDUM FOR THE
XECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
F NAVAL RECORDS
(BCNR)
Subj :
ICl(SW)'
Ref:
(a)
Pers-OOZZB/NPC-OOZCB
memo 5420 of 22 Nov 02
1.
In response to reference (a),
a review of Petty Officer
record on file and Alcohol and Drug Management
ervice
ormation System (ADMITS) have been conducted to consider
member's request for removal of derogatory material.
Review of member's service record reveals no evidence of
2.
proceedings from a positive drug test.
:no drug laboratory positive results.
database indicates
reviews conducted, removal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report
(DAAR) from subject member's
naval records is warranted.
Further,
review of ADMITS
Based on
oint of
can be reached at
Drug Abuse
(PERS-663)
Prevent
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03466-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the OPNAV 5350-2 Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report (DAAR) dated 17 November 1992, concerning drug screening. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Geisler and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2003, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07693-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing her commander date of rank to restore her relative seniority in her officer community. They recommend adjusting her date of rank to 1 June 1998. The petitioner promoted to commander at the month point in keeping with her running mates and within flow point guidelines of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2701 14
On 29 January 1999, an NPC message directed that her command prepare a page 13 counseling/warning stating that she was being retained in the Navy despite her defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by her failure to disclose pre-service treatment for alcohol abuse. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board concludes that by her disclosing her pre-service DUI, five day alcohol awareness class and wrongful use of marijuana in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01759-02
This is a strong statement when another senior chaplain in the Navy can make a signed statement that XXXX had the capacity of bias in fitness reports. I recommend XXXX fitness reports dated 94AUG31 to 95JAN31 and 95FEBO to 96JAN31 be removed from his permanent record and that he be considered in-zone at the next regularLieutenant Command r promotion board. Based on the comments provided in references (b) and (c), we believe the fitness reports in question should be removed from Lieuten
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08353-01
They stated ” They further stated “By waiting until 1 October 2001, her Air Force promotion to Command (NPC) office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect that Petitioner the Naval Reserve Lieutenant Commander promotion list “From the documentation provided in [her application at enclosure (l)], it is apparent the member was given inappropriate counsel as to the timing of her appointment into the Naval Reserve. They find Petitioner ’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05323-01
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report and related material: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period From of Report To 98Sep14 b. Based on that assessment, I recommend Lieutenant Commander itness report for the requested period and the Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENT LIEUTENANT COMMANDE "failure to select" be removed from her record, and that she considered by a Special Selection Board for promotion to the grade of Commander. The member...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04665-02
” references to NJP, rather than completely removing the was set aside, there is no indication that the marks on aits or the promotion recommendation were made solely based d. In correspondence (3), the NPC office having cognizance over mmended removing the entire contested fitness report, stating fitness report matters has r “In view of the member ’s JP being set aside, the member ’s performance trait marks and ” promotion recommendation are now considered inappropriate. ’s record. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05297-02
The GCMCA declined to act on Petitioner's specific complaint about the NJP since applicable directives state that such a disciplinary action is not a proper subject of an Article 138 complaint. OONOV02' to OlMAR15, as corrected by the (GCMCA), refers to the results of (NJP) where the charged deiekination that your Evaluation Report for the reporting period of;ense does not state an offense under the UCMJ. Paragraph 4 q. UCMJ Article 92(1)2 states that it is an offense to or beyond the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06294-02
That Petitioner ’s fitness report and rel hed as enclosure (3), the NPC office having cognizance over mented to the effect that Petitioner ’s request has merit and n of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the record be corrected by removing therefrom the following Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report From To 02May30 CDR SN 02FebOl 02Apr22 b. I The member requests the removal of his fitness report for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08432-01
d. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Additionally, the applicable regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous entry-alcohol abuse. " That Petitioner's naval record be corrected'by issuing him a new DD Form 214 which reflects that he served on active duty from 8 February to 8 March...