DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
)ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 8055-01
19 December 2002
*.
r_.__,.____l
referent
This is in
naval record pursua
Sectia
States Code,
A three-member pane
Records, sitting in
D
application on 17
injustice were
revi
regulations and pro
Board.
Documentary
your application, t
thereof, your naval
and policies.
After careful and c
record, the Board f
insufficient to est
error or injustice.
The Board found tha
November 1951.
The
punishment and were
offenses included u
obey a lawful order
a general discharge
Reserve.
Character of
servict
averages
proficiency
assigned during
per
proficiency
averages
conduct mark of 4.0
characterization of
In its review of
yol
potentially mitigati
immaturity.
Howevel
not sufficient to
wi
to your
t to the
1552 .
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United
of the Board for Correction of Naval
executive session, considered your
member 2002.
Your allegations of error and
tied in accordance with administrative
zdures applicable to the proceedings of this
naterial considered by the Board consisted of
Iether with all material submitted in support
record and applicable statutes, regulations
lscientious consideration of the entire
md that the evidence submitted was
2lish the existence of probable material
you were inducted in the Marine Corps on 5
record reflects that you received nonjudicial
convicted by a special court-martial.
The
nuthorized absences of 31 days and failure to
Thereafter, on 4 November 1953 you received
nnd were transferred to the Marine Corps
is based, in part, on one's conduct and
both of which are computed from marks
;dic evaluations.
Your conduct and
were 3.66 and 5.58, respectively.
ras required for a fully honorable
service at the time of separation.
: application the Board carefully weighed all
1g factors, such as your youth and
, the Board concluded that these factors were
rant recharacterization of your discharge
A minimum
wagi insufficiently high to warrant a fully
Accordingly, your application has been
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
given the two disciplinary actions as well as the fact that your
conduct average
honorable discharge.
denied.
furnished upon request.
It is regretted
tha.t the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action
ca.nnot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other ratter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01385-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of N a n 1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01134-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04371-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record reflects that you received four The offenses included unauthorized Thereafter, on 21 September 1979 you Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and proficiency averages, both of which are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06307-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two conviction, and your failure to achieve the required average in conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06115-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. administrative discharge stating, in part, as follows: On 23 August 1990 the psychiatrist recommended your You Although not presently considered a danger to himself, he may make further suicidal threats or gestures...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09580-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 24 March 1964. Prior to being assigned to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 0616-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. A minimum average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04659-04
On 20 August 1979 you were released from active duty and assigned to a Marine Corps Reserve unit. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE—4.Character of service is based, in part, on one’s conduct and proficiency averages, both of which are computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations. A review of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning repeated tardiness to morning muster, positive urinalysis results indicating illegal use of THC and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03036-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2002. average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04499-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to However: the Board concluded that these factors were waPrant recharacterization of your discharge such as your youth and due to the two disciplinary actions as well as the fact that your conduct average...