DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
2 NAVY ANNE
X
RECORD
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No:
11 October 2002
7772-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 October 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together'with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record-and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 20 October 1997.
While your record does not contain the separation processing
documents, it appears that the commanding officer recommended
that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by
reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and, after
review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for
separation was approved.
discharged on 18 September 1998 with an other than honorable
discharge by reason of misconduct.
At that time, you were
assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
The record clearly shows that you were
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of
misconduct.
others in your situation,
injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Since you have been treated no differently than
the Board could not find an error or
The names and
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did
not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your
administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached
Board (NDRB).
DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06344-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00177-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07341-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of togetheriwith all material submitted in support your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations Your allegations of error and After careful and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07989-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08424-01
10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01088-03
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07998-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09801-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02826-02
At that time, you were assigned a When informed of this After review by Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. the Board could not find an error or The names and The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07462-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge by reason At that time you were assigned of misconduct on 19 August 1994. a reenlistment code of RE-4. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...