S
-
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 7748-01
23 October 2002
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a)
Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1)
(2)
(3)
DD Form 149 w/attachments
Series of Documents
Subject’s naval record
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to reenlistment in the rate/grade of
AME3/E4 vice
AMESN/E3
.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Neuschafer, and Agesti, reviewed Petitioner
allegations of error and injustice on 22 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
’s
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
RECOMMENDATION:
Docket No: 7748-01
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that his reenlistment
of 20 August 2001 is in the rate/grade of
2001 is for a term of two (2) years with a 24
to show that the reenlistment of 20 August
month extension agreement to become operative on 20 August 2003 vice a four (4) years,
AME3/E4 vice
AMESN/E3 and further corrected
a. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
)iK%--
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
23 October 2002
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08085-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the enlistment of 29 November 2001 is in paygrade E4, vice E3. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04144-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Whitenen, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken evidence of record. tinds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 08_15_11 CDT 2000
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in paygrade E4 vice E3. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Mathews, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06804-01
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. 25 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, iil_lustice on , reviewed Petitioner ’s 3. (2), the Board tinds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02502-01
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in paygrade HMYE4. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Ms. Madison, reviewed 5 September 2001 and, pursuant to its Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05004-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the reenlistment of 25 January 2001 is in paygrade YN3 (E4). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05055-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05757-01
1552 Encl : (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CMC (3) Subject ’s naval record memorand~~m I 100 RE-43 of 6 September 200 1 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in a higher paygrade. ili_jilstice on 2 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, be taken on the available ’s 3. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Recorder GQA.W~ G. L. ADAMS Acting Recorder Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07282-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Sub_ject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be The Board, consisting of Messrs. 2. allegations of error and determined that the corrective evidence of record. aclclressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08222-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...