Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07275-01
Original file (07275-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

ELP
Docket No. 7275-01
11 February 2002

From:
To:

Subj:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

ORD  OF

Ref:

(a) 10 U.S.C.1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's Naval Record

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this
Board requesting, in effect,
to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general
discharge issued on 1 November 1948.

that his naval record be corrected

The Board, consisting of Messrs.  

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice

2.
Ivins
on 6 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies.

Leeman, Rothlein, and

Documentary material

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record

3.
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that Petitioner's application to

the Board was not filed in a timely manner, it is in the
interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and
review the application on its merits.

C .

1945 for three years at age 17. At
he had completed 10 years of formal

Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 2 November
the time of his enlistment,
education.

d.

Petitioner was advanced to

PFC (E-2) and served for 14
However, during the seven month period

months without incident.
from January to July 1947 he received three nonjudicial
punishments 
general orders, an unspecified absence over leave, and
negligence in the performance of his duties.
circumstances of the third NJP are not shown in the record.

NJPs were for violation of

Two of the 

(NJP).

The facts and

e.

During the four month period from March to June 1948,
The
Petitioner was convicted by two summary courts-martial.
first was for a one day period of unauthorized absence and the
second was for sleeping on watch.
without further incident and received a general discharge upon
the expiration of his enlistment on 1 November 1948.
conduct and proficiency averages at the time of discharge were
4.87 and 4.31, respectively.

Thereafter, Petitioner served

His

f.

Characterization of service is determined in part, by
a-carages computed from marks assigned

conduct and proficiency  
during periodic evaluations.
would have qualified him for a fully honorable characterization
of service.
Petitioner's service, prohibited the issuance of an honorable
discharge to individuals convicted by a general court-martial or
more than one summary courts-martial.

However, regulations in effect at the time of

Petitioner's averages normally

g.

Concerning the charges of the first summary  

Petitioner states that the lieutenant who preferred the
charges for both summary tours-martial did not like him for some
reason.
martial, he claims that he was 24 hours late in returning from
The
leave because his flight was delayed due to a snowstorm.
second court-martial was for sitting down and sleeping on guard
He now admits that he was sitting down, but asserts that
duty.
he was not sleeping.
Petitioner provides letters of reference
attesting to his good character and achievements subsequent to
discharge, and documents showing that he retired after 30 years
of Federal service as a GS-13.

court-

h.

A report from the Federal Bureau of Investigation

obtained by the Board shows no convictions.

2

CONCLUSION:

Additionally, there is no longer a

NJPs and two summary courts-martial were

In this regard, it appears that the offenses for which

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
he received the three  
relatively minor in nature.
prohibition against an honorable discharge for an individual
with two convictions by summary court-martial.
Petitioner's two courts-martial,
averages were sufficient to warrant a fully honorable
characterization of service.
service conduct and achievements far outweigh his misconduct in
the Marine Corps, and it is unjust to continue to stigmatize his
service as only under honorable conditions.
Board concludes that his general discharge should be  
terized to fully honorable.

The Board believes his  

post-

his conduct and proficiency

Accordingly, the

recharac-

Absent

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by showing
that he was honorably discharged on 1 November 1948 by reason of
expiration of enlistment,
issued on that date.

\iFce the general discharge actually

That this Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

b.

C .

That upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs

be informed the Petitioner's application was received by the
Board on 19 September 2001.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. 
Recorder

ZSALMAN

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6

5.
(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

3

Naval Records   (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6
(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is
hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a),
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

has been approved by the

Executive Di



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07071-05

    Original file (07071-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, aformer enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1)with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record becorrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than theundesirable discharge issued on 18 November 1963.2. It provides Navy and Marine Corps officials with the authority to involuntarily separate those service members who commit a homosexual act or acts. Using the standards of reference (b), the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02665-02

    Original file (02665-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Ms. 1 . Furthermore, the Board concluded that his extensive combat service and his proficiency and conduct marks warrant a fully honorable characterization of service, and are sufficient to outweigh his brief period of misconduct. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06981-07

    Original file (06981-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an honorable characterization of service vice the under honorable characterization of service that was issued on 29 May 1967.2. The Board is aware that during the time of Petitioner’s service, an honorable characterization of service was normally conditioned upon minimum proficiency and conduct mark averages of 3.8 and 4.0, respectively.CONCLUSION:Upon...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06258-00

    Original file (06258-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three a deck court and a summary court-martial, and failure to received the require average in conduct. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00626-05

    Original file (00626-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 626-05 24 October 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF ~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Shortly after the conviction by SPCM, on 31 July 1960, Petitioner received adverse marks of 1.0 and 3.4 in conduct and proficiency, respectively. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07510-03

    Original file (07510-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting his record be corrected by removing a conviction by summary court-martial (SCM) and upgrading his discharge.2. Based on the foregoing the Board concludes that no useful purpose is served by continuing to characterize Petitioner’s service as having been under honorable conditions, and relief in the form of recharacterization to a fully honorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03468-01

    Original file (03468-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3468-01 31 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (b) Navy-Marine Corps Awards Manual (1) DD Form (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 149‘w/attachments I From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, requesting, in effect, show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 May 1972 and that he be awarded the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07717-00

    Original file (07717-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the characterization of his separation from under honorable conditions to fully honorable. The minimum i. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to an individual who completes his enlistment but is not recommended for reenlistment due to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01818-01

    Original file (01818-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (b) SECNAVINST 1910.4A (1) DD Form 149 (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 5 May 1948. filed enclosure (1) with this The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Brezna, and 2. reviewed,Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03886-03

    Original file (03886-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 2 July 1964. f. On 9 June 1964, after Petitioner was advised of administrative separation action and waived his right to an administrative discharge board, the commanding officer recommended that he be separated...