DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 7214-01
4 February 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 January 2002.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 20 September
1960 at age 18.
nonjudicial punishment and were convicted by a summary
martial.
of duty and stealing a white hat.
The record reflects that you received
The offenses included absence from your appointed place
court-
On 30 July 1962 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of misconduct
due to fraudulent enlistment.
of pre-service civilian charges of auto theft.
the recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present
your case to an administrative discharge board.
After review by
the discharge authority,
approved and you received an undesirable discharge on 7 September
1962.
This was based on your concealment
When informed of
the recommendation for separation was
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
immaturity.
such as your youth and
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge in
view of your concealment of pre-service civil involvement and the
two disciplinary actions.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
denied.
furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden-is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01307-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04617-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful andconscientious conserdation of theentire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice YouenlistedtheMarine Corps on 5 July 1968 at age 17. Additionally, on 28 October 1968, during a physical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10962-07
Documentary material considered by the board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After being informed of the recommendation, you waived the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01092 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 October 1965, you were convicted by a SPCM of being UA for 113 days.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03537-01
During this period you Subsequently, on 30 December 1969, you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of the foregoing 141 day period of UA and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for four months, reduction to and forfeitures were suspended for four months. and the reason I went UA in the first place was the fear of being caught in a homosexual act with someone in the service." My biggest fear since I can't On 28 January 1970 you were notified of pending administrative separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05568-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you elected to waive the right to present your case to an After review by the discharge administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02898-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. of officers convened on 20 January 1955 and recommended that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of You declined to submit a Thereafter, you were notified that pre- The Board concluded that the A current FBI report obtained by the Board In its review of your application...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6124 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09405-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, the discharge authority directed your commanding officer to issue you a general discharge by reason of unfitness due to the civil...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01322-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board...