Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07019-02
Original file (07019-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Y

S

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 7019-02
5 December 2002

This is in reference  to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

\

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
mater&al considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

Documentary 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

On 18 May 1990 you submitted a written request for an

The Board found  that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 10 May
1988.
other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-
martial for an unauthorized absence from 30 September 1988 to 24
Prior to submitting this request you conferred with
April 1990.
a qualified military lawyer at which time you were advised of
your rights and warned of the probable adverse consequences of
accepting such a discharge.
result of this action, you were spared the stigma of a court-
martial conviction and the potential penalties of a punitive
discharge and confinement at hard labor.
than honorable discharge on 5 June 1990.
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

Your request was granted and, as a

You received the other
At that time, you were

The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is
discharged in lieu of court-martial.
no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not
find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment

Since you have been treated

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

code.
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

The names

The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did
not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your
administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached
Board (NDRB).
DD Form 293.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

w. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03535-02

    Original file (03535-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that the other than honorable discharge was appropriate given your request for discharge in lieu of trial for two instances of assault, breach of the peace, wrongful use of marijuana, believed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-01

    Original file (00870-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870-01 24 January 2002 Dear Mr.- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 16 January 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07835-01

    Original file (07835-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2002. The Board believed that a record which included three nonjudicial punishments and a conviction by a special court-martial was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. In addition, regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals serving in pay grade E-2 on completion of an extended period of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07480-09

    Original file (07480-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your daughter’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05622-02

    Original file (05622-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. enlistment contract required you to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. Accordingly, your application The names and votes of the members of the panel An individual separated with such a The Board did not consider whether your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04111-07

    Original file (04111-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when a Sailor is discharged due to misconduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00580-02

    Original file (00580-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 23 February 1988 for three years. The Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code since you were treated no differently than others discharged under similar circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07277-01

    Original file (07277-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than honorable discharge on 28 September 2000. were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08927-02

    Original file (08927-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07654-02

    Original file (07654-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. that you received...