Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07007-00
Original file (07007-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
CjEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOAAD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

,

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

BJG
Docket No: 
23 January 2001

700740

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested reappointment
or reinstatement as a second lieutenant.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 January 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Marine Corps Recruiting Command, dated
30 November 

2oo0, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. You assert that you made a mistake by resigning your commission after having
been “mad” at yourself for not passing a single land navigation exercise at The Basic School,
and that you did not know all of your options. They were unable to find any error or
injustice in your having resigned your commission. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

In this

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

UNITED STATES MARINE
MARINE CORPS RECRUITING COMMAND

 

CORPs

3280 RUSSELL ROAD

QUANTICO. VA 22 134-5 103

IN 

REPLY 

REFER 

TO

1331
MCRC  (0)
30 Nov 00

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
OF NAVAL RECORDS

, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

S

Ref:

(a) BCNR Docket 
(b) 
P1100.73

MC0 

#07007-00

E CASE OF SECOND 

LIEUTEN

1. In response to reference (a), we have reviewed Second Lieutena
Officer Candidates training record and the provisions of reference (b). Based on our
review, we recommend that his request be disapproved.

’

2. Second 
friable decision.

Lieuten

rovide sufficient infor m ation for us to base a

Deputy Assistant Chief of Staff
Officer Programs



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05613-00

    Original file (05613-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 14 August 2000, and a memorandum for the record dated 11 July 2001, copies of which are attached. nd Lieutenant Colon challenged report centers around the accuracy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08391-07

    Original file (08391-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from the Headquarters Marine Corps Career Management Team, dated 23 October 2007 with enclosures, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-00

    Original file (08299-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested correction of your record to show your voluntary resignation from the Naval Reserve on 30 June 1991, rather than involuntary discharge on 31 December 1994 by reason of two failures of selection to lieutenant commander. his in All members of the Ready Reserve, including IRR members, are 4. required by law to be considered by promotion selection boards, whether or not they are actively participating. It was during this time that he stopped active participation with his unit,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04591-99

    Original file (04591-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When COL B asked GYSGT M for proof of his assertion that you were involved with his wife, GYSGT M said that LT M had admitted the affair to him and said that the relationship had begun when both of you attended school in Rhode Island. not to contest the findings at that On 19 January 1996 you and your military counsel signed a Memorandum of Agreement in which you agreed disposition of the allegation against me at punishment (NJP) and proceeding, or on appeal of that that it was "expressly...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08884-02

    Original file (08884-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. absence due to aptitude, performance review board. resignation from and elected not to appear before a On 31 January 2001 the commanding You then submitted your On 6 December 2000 you WI11 On 6 February 2001 the Bureau...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08509-00

    Original file (08509-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They say the only action required of Petitioner to return to active duty or the Ready Reserve, if this correction is approved, is to request a Naval Reserve commission and submit a Ready Reserve service agreement to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001

    i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04072-00

    Original file (04072-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You again request that this fitness report be removed, and you add a new request for consideration by a special selection board for promotion to lieutenant colonel. petitioner alleges that senior officers, career counselors, and at least one monitor, him of fair consideration for command, promotion, and school selection. record and FYOl 0 and Subsequently, he Senior fitness requests removal of In our opinion, removing the petitioned report would have 3. significantly increased the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07711-00

    Original file (07711-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. They had no grounds to remove your failure by the FY 2002 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, since they found insufficient basis to remove your failure by the FY 2001 selection board, and the fitness report in question was in your record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03797-02

    Original file (03797-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 31 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...