Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06889-01
Original file (06889-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY  

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

MEH:ddj
Docket’No: 6889-01
23 January 

2002

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)
(3)

DD Form 149 w/attachments
NPC memorandum 1160
Subject’s naval record

Per-s 8 11 of 19 December 2001

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to cancel a reenlistment.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner
allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

’s

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

In correspondence attached as enclosure  

(2), the office having cognizance over the

subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure  
following corrective action.

(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

Docket No: 6889-01

a. The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 3 July 2001 is null and void. EAOS

will revert to 30 November 2002. Member was erroneously approved for a zone

 

“B” SRB.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

23 January 2002

W. DEAN PF
Executive 

Direc



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07100-01

    Original file (07100-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone OS rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06821-01

    Original file (06821-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone GSM rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05687-01

    Original file (05687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the SH rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06749-01

    Original file (06749-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07062-01

    Original file (07062-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05004-01

    Original file (05004-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the reenlistment of 25 January 2001 is in paygrade YN3 (E4). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07078-01

    Original file (07078-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5342. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06975-01

    Original file (06975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08456-01

    Original file (08456-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. Gilbert, McCormick, and Mr. Milner, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08365-01

    Original file (08365-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 4 January 2002 8365-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ----T- -- RI?%‘IEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...