Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06552-02
Original file (06552-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVYANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 6552-02
11 December 2002

Your allegations of error and

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13
February 1968.
nonjudicial punishments.
The offenses included an unauthorized
absence of six days,
consumption of alcohol in an unauthorized
area, absence from your appointed place of duty, and failure to
obey a lawful order.
On 26 October 1970 you submitted a written request for an
undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial
for an unauthorized absence of 49 days, possession of a false
identification card, liberty pass, and overnight pass; and
disrespect.
a qualified military lawyer at which time you were advised of
your rights and warned of the probable adverse consequences‘of
accepting such a discharge.
court-
result of this action, you were spared the stigma of a 
martial conviction and the potential penalties of a punitive
discharge and confinement at hard labor.
undesirable discharge on 24 November 1970.

Prior to submitting this request you conferred with

The record reflects that you received two

Your request was granted and, as a

You received an

and unauthorized absences totalling

In its review of your application the Board carefully'weighed all
such as your youth and immaturity
potentially mitigating factors,
However, the Board found that these
and your service in Vietnam.
factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
discharge given the seriousness of the offenses, that resulted in
your request for discharge,
The Board believed that considerable clemency
nearly two months.
was extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid
trial by court-martial was approved since, by this action, you
escaped the possibility of confinement at hard labor and a
punitive discharge.
Further, the Board concluded that you
received the benefit of your bargain when your request for
discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it
now.
Therefore, the Board concluded that no change to the
discharge is warranted.
denied.
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Accordingly, your application has been
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06277-03

    Original file (06277-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07600-02

    Original file (07600-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10 of the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were awarded confinement at hard labor paygrade E-2, and forfeitures of On 23 March 1971, you commenced a second period of authorized absence that did not terminate until you were apprehended by civilian...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06568-02

    Original file (06568-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor forfeitures of $50 per month for three months, On 31 January 1970, the convening Your record further reflects you were an unauthorized absentee from 5 March 1970 to 2...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04275-02

    Original file (04275-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that you were issued a clemency 1970's and not an honorable discharge as you The Board believed that considerable clemency was extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by this action, Further, of confinement at hard...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03087-02

    Original file (03087-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and especially your request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06718-02

    Original file (06718-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. was granted and, as a result of this action, you were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction and the potential penalties of a punitive discharge and confinement at hard labor. not sufficient to warrant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01421-02

    Original file (01421-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for serious offenses, and the prior unauthorized absences of more than a month. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04395-02

    Original file (04395-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The Board found that your request was granted on 8 On 5 July 1977 your discharge was upgraded to general under the provisions of the Special Discharge Review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06320-01

    Original file (06320-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    request for discharge was granted and your commanding officer was directed to issue you an undesirable discharge. Prior to submitting this request for discharge, you On 10 March 1972 The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully considered all mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, service in Vietnam, and your contention that because of your personality disorder you could not adjust to duty in the United States after your tour of Vietnam. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01430-02

    Original file (01430-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. request for discharge was granted and your commanding officer was As a result of directed to issue you an undesirable discharge. extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by this action, you escaped the possibility of confinement at...