DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVALRECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No:
9 September 2002
6516-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 28 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application, together 'with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Your allegations of error and
considered your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28
February 1974 at age 17.
two nonjudicial punishments.
obey a lawful order and assault on two occasions.
The record reflects that you received
The offenses included failure to
On 11 June 1974 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with a general discharge by reason of unsuitability due
to a defective attitude.
authority,
you were separated with a general discharge.
the recommendation was approved and on 18 June 1974
After review by the discharge
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
and the contention that you should be reinstated in the Marine
Corps as a Federal procurement military war attorney.
the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to
warrant reinstatement,
given the two disciplinary actions you
received in less
thaq, four months of service, and since you were
properly and appropriately discharged in June 1974, and have not
such as your youth and immaturity
However,
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
had any military status since that time.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03716-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. request was granted and your commanding officer was directed to issue you an other than honorable discharge by reason of good of As a result of the service in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04951-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted your naval record and applicable statutes, pr0cedure.s applicable to the proceedings of this Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00909-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. day period of UA that was not terminated until you were apprehended on 29 September 1976. submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the two periods of UA totalling...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09439-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 16 August 1972 for two years at age 22 after about six months...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02632-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures.applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your received a letter from commanding On 19 December 1973, officer by certified mail concerning your missed drills of 7 December 1973. concerning your missed drills, however, you never responded to On 20 January 1974...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06338-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05149-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your record also reflects that on 9 December 1974 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for two periods of UA totalling four days, absence from your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07401-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03027-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. AS & result, on 19 March 1975, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court- martial for the three foregoing periods of UA totalling 376 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06291-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board, in its review of your record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, limited education, and low test The Board also considered your contention...