DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC: ddj
Docket No: 6312-02
24 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
_--
-
_
-
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 24 September 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum RFL F9 7200 of 30 August 2002, a copy of which is
attached.
Your allegations of error and injustice were
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775
IN REPLY REFER TO:
RFL-F9
720,O
fiCCJ
i . "
..J<.
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
BCNR APPLICATION IN THE
CASE OF
GIJJVNF,RY
We have been requested to provide an advisory opinion on
Sergean-
.,i
1.
Gunnery
.c
of travel expenses
Gunnery
Pittsburgh, PA.
Sergeant- transferred from Okinawa, Japan to
four a permanent change of station move.
's application requesting reimbursement
Review of archived travel voucher records at Defense Finance
2.
and Accounting Service-Kansas City have shown that a travel
voucher for this permanent change of station move was submitted
and settled on November 07, 1996, DOV 081206.
revealed that SNM received three separate travel advances for the
period concerned and only two of the advances were deducted from
the travel settlement.
This results in an outstanding debt of
$483.60 due to the advance paid on DOV 003144, dated April
1996.
not reflect his indebtedness to the government for $483.60.
office will coordinate with Gunnery Sergeant
servicing Disbursing Office to correct voucher'-081206
initiate collection of $483.60.
the only error in
22,
SNM's record is that it does
Therefore,
Our research also
and
This
Point of contact for this advisory opinion is Chief Warrant
3.
Officer-2 Carey at (703) 614-4981.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609795C070209
APPLICANT STATES: That he went TDY from Panama [his permanent duty station] to Honduras. On 12 September 1995, he was issued TDY orders for a 179-day assignment to Honduras. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006328
The applicant states: * as directed by permanent change of station (PCS) orders, he was required to move from Fort Carson to Fort Leonard Wood * he requested a PPM instead of having the government move his household goods (HHG) * as a requirement for claiming travel expenses, he had his moving truck weighed full near Kansas City, MO * at one point during his family's travels to Fort Leonard Wood, he stopped to assist his wife with the care of their then 3-month old daughter * while assisting...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00002
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: JPPSO-SAT/ECAF recommends denial of the applicant’s waiver request. The overpayment was the result of his failure to list the travel advances he received when he filed his final travel voucher. However,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087978C070212
There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, that he was given the authority to make a DITY move and that he was provided a DD Form 2278, Application for Do-It-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, before moving his dependent and household good to the vicinity of Fort Gordon, Georgia. Since the sentence was set aside by the US Court of Military Appeals and all rights, privileges, and property of which he had been deprived by virtue of the findings of guilty, and the sentence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010566
The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his PCS Orders; DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave), dated 3 May 2006; DD Form 2278 (Application for DITY and Counseling Checklist); FHT Form 55-X25 (DITY Information Data Sheet); Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Travel Voucher, dated 12 May 2006, with a copy of his DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 May 2006; DFAS Travel Voucher, dated 11 May 2009; DITY Checklist and Certification of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003141
On 7 March 2011, DFAS sent a letter to the applicant's home of record address in Lake Worth, FL, notifying him that records in the Travel Division showed he had received monies from the U.S. Government for his move as an advance under travel orders, dated 8 March 2010. e. A DD Form 1351-2, dated 23 November 2011, whereon he indicated he had received a previous government advance in the amount of $5,510.30 and he claimed he had incurred a rental vehicle expense in the amount of $2,563.00 in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005786
The applicant requests his debt in the amount of $6,669.00 be remitted. The applicant provides: * Memorandum, dated 12 January 2011, from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 12 October 2010 * Two recommendations for remission of debt * Army Emergency Relief worksheets * DA Form 3508 (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) * Travel vouchers * Letter, dated 9 August 2010, from DFAS * Individual Traveler Valid Payment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026758
The applicant requests, in effect, reimbursement for the personally-procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG), based on 95 percent (%) of the Government Constructed Cost (GCC) and in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), and that the estimated gross incentive (95% reimbursement estimate) cited on his DD Form 2278 (Application for Do It Yourself (DITY) Move and Counseling Checklist), dated 25 January 2010, be used instead of the estimated gross incentive cited on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08128-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Permanent Change of Station (PCS) entitlements including Dislocation Allowance (DLA) for making a move from Madison, WI to Pensacola, FL. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Novello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010774
The applicant states that despite the fact that his orders were not issued until November 2005, he was informed by his commander that he would relocate to Fort Campbell immediately upon re-deployment in October 2005, and he was in agreement that his family should relocate prior to that time so that his children could begin the school year at Fort Campbell. DFAS stated that based on the information provided by his office and the applicant that reimbursement for shipment of HHG and the travel...