Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05121-02
Original file (05121-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

WMP
Docket No:
26 November 2002

5121-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof,
regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

Your allegations of error and

your naval record and applicable statutes,

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 December 1951
at age 17. At that time, you had completed 10 years of education
and attained test scores which placed you in Mental Group III.

You served without incident until 28 April 1952 when you
received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to go to your
appointed place of duty.
The punishment imposed was 14 days of
restriction.
On 5 June 1952 you again received NJP for failure
to go to your appointed place of duty.
The punishment imposed
was 10 hours of extra duty.

Your record further reflects that you served in Korea from 31
July 1952 to 10 January 1953.
were awarded the Korean Service Medal, United Nations Service
Medal, and the China Service Medal.

During this period of service you

On 10 July 1953 you were convicted by a summary court martial of
disorderly conduct, disrespect to military police, and
communicating a threat.
restriction and a forfeiture of $20.
convening authority approved the adjudged sentence and ordered
its execution.

You were sentenced to 30 days of
On 11 July 1953 the

On 5 January 1954 you were convicted by a special court martial
You were
of failure to go to your appointed place of duty.
sentenced to confinement at hard labor for three days and 30
days of restriction.
approved the adjudged sentence and ordered its execution.

On 11 January 1954 the convening authority

You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six

On 1 March 1954 you were convicted by a special court martial of
failure to obey a general order, theft,
weapon.
months, forfeitures of $70 per month for six months, and a bad
On 9 December 1954, after the findings and
conduct discharge.
sentence were approved by the Board of Review, you received the
bad conduct discharge.

and carrying a concealed

However, the Board concluded that your

appl.ication the Board carefully weighed

In its review of your  
all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
immaturity, limited education, and your contention that your
sentence was too severe.
conviction at a special court martial for purchasing black
market merchandise,
concealed weapon were very serious charges that clearly
warranted severe punishment,
Additionally, your prior record of misconduct, including two
NJP's and two court martial convictions showed your total
disregard for authority.
denied.
furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

theft of a military firearm, and carrying a

which the court martial imposed.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.

it is important to keep in mind that

You are entitled to have

In this regard,

2

a presumption of regularity attaches
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

to all official records.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04999-02

    Original file (04999-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted your husband's naval record and applicable Your allegations of error and considered your After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05183-03

    Original file (05183-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 December 1952 at age 17. On 23 November 1953 you received...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01439-01

    Original file (01439-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. court- martial (SPCM) of disobedience and a day of unauthorized absence (UA) month, a $50 forfeiture of pay, - You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03313-02

    Original file (03313-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 31 August 1954 you received NJP for failure to The punishment imposed was The punishment imposed was 14 days of that On 14 September 1954, you were convicted by summary martial of breaking restriction. convicted of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04568-06

    Original file (04568-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. During the period from 10 June to 22 August 1953 you received two NJP’s for brief period of UA, missing restricted muster, disobedience, and failure to muster for hard labor. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07134-00

    Original file (07134-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record further reflects that on 19 May 1954 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of an eight day period of UA and sentenced to hard labor for 15 days, a $10 forfeiture of On 9 September 1954, while in a UA status, you were apprehended by civil authorities for temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607857C070209

    Original file (9607857C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was convicted by three summary courts-martial, one special court-martial, and one general court-martial. All of his convictions appear to have been for different offenses. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION Loren G. Harrell Director INDEX CASE ID AR1998012413 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 1999/02/18 TYPE OF DISCHARGE BCD DATE OF DISCHARGE 1954/11/18 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR615-364 DISCHARGE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01128-04

    Original file (01128-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injusticeThe Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 July 1951 at age 17. On 7 February 1955 you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03716-07

    Original file (03716-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, desire to upgrade your discharge, and the passage of time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06703-00

    Original file (06703-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2001. The record reflects that you were advanced to SA (E-2) and received the Korean Service Medal for service on board USS JUNEAU (CLkA-119) from 5 September to 17 October 1952. On 18 June 1954 the commanding officer recommended discharge by reason of unfitness and stated that on 7 June 1954 an administrative discharge board (ADB) had thoroughly reviewed...