DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 5065-02
25 November 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty from 10 May 1982 to 8 May 1985, when you
were discharged with a bad conduct discharge pursuant to the approved sentence of a special
court-martial. You were convicted of unauthorized absence and forging a signature on a
military payroll check. The Board could not find any indication in the available records that
you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge.
In
addition, the Board noted that even if you had been unfit for duty, you would not have been
entitled to disability evaluation processing because of the nature of the disciplinary action
taken against you, and your resulting bad conduct discharge. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
prevcously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08095-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04422-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were As there is no indication in the available records that you were unfit to perform your duties by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge, or that your discharge was erroneous or unjust, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02269-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. You were convicted by general court-martial on 14 March 1955 of the offense of desertion, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for one year and six months, total forfeiture of pay and allowances for that period, and to be discharged with a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08408-02
A three-member panel of session, considered your injustice were reviewed in applicable to the proceedin consisted of your appli naval record records were lost. Documentary material considered by the Board together with all material submitted in support thereof, your s, regulations and policies. applyi g for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the : W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02012-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. You were discharged by reason of unsuitability/personality disorder on 19 October 1979. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04018-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. The Board concluded that your receipt of substantial disability ratings from the VA effective the day after you were discharged from the Navy is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your Navy record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07565-02
Documentary material considered by the Board Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board found that you underwent a pre-enlistment physical examination on 19 July 2000. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07751-07
You were sentenced to be discharged from the Marine Corps with a bad conduct discharge. You were separated from the Marine Corps with a bad conduct discharge on 24 February 1971, upon completion of appellate review. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03605-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, it considered the comments of your counsel with administrative regulations and procedures Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07173-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submittedinsupport thereof, yournaval recordandapplicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 2 May 1973. You were discharged on 6 March...