Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04217-02
Original file (04217-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 4217-02
12 August 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of

naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United

States Code, Section 1552.

  your

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 7 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application, together 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
with all material submitted in support

Your allegations of error and

considered your

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you were inducted in the Marine Corps on 30
September 1966 after more than six months of prior active duty.
The record reflects that you received nonjudicial punishment and
were convicted by two special courts-martial.
included unauthorized absences totalling 167 days.
The second
court-martial sentenced you to a bad conduct discharge, which was
suspended.

The offenses

A third special court-martial convened on 22 July 1968 and found
you guilty of an unauthorized absence of 34 days.
The court
sentenced you to confinement at hard labor for six months,
forfeitures of $97 per month for six months, and a bad conduct
discharge.
1968.

You received the bad conduct discharge on 1 October

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially,mitigati~g factors, such as your youth and immaturity
and family problems.
factors were'not  

suf:icient to warrant recharacterization of your

However, the Board concluded that these

discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences
The Board also noted that the
totalled  more than six months.
initial sentence to a bad conduct discharge was suspended, thus
giving you an opportunity to earn a better discharge.
you continued   to commit   offenses,
to a bad conduct discharge.
concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

However,
resulting in another sentence

Based on the foregoing, the Board

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06284-02

    Original file (06284-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A special court-martial convened on 19 January 1968 and convicted you of an unauthorized absence of about 61 days. However, it does not change the facts of the underlying The Board concluded that the discharge was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04432-01

    Original file (04432-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. continued your periods of unauthorized absence which resulted in the discharge being executed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07212-02

    Original file (07212-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled more than six months. ~onsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05868-01

    Original file (05868-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00130-01

    Original file (00130-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. "I want out of the military service because On 16 July 1968 you received On 14 June You On 28 March 1969, the Naval Discharge Review Board considered your case and concluded that the original...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05560-01

    Original file (05560-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to.the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled nearly Accordingly, your Based on the foregoing,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06568-02

    Original file (06568-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor forfeitures of $50 per month for three months, On 31 January 1970, the convening Your record further reflects you were an unauthorized absentee from 5 March 1970 to 2...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07579-02

    Original file (07579-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 1974 the suspended bad conduct discharge was ordered executed due to this period of absence. in the discharge being executed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05057-02

    Original file (05057-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03204-02

    Original file (03204-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Subsequently, there was a two day period of Prier to A special court-martial convened on 10 April 1961 and convicted you of two periods of unauthorized absence...