Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04216-00
Original file (04216-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 42 16-00
21 March 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

#Wl*:r,...

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)

(3)

DD Form 149 w/attachments
Telecon between Ms. Law, Retired Pay Section, DFAS-Cleveland and
Ms. Crone, BCNR on 15 Mar 01
Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show promoted when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

In correspondence attached as enclosure 

(2), the office having cognizance over the

subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

__

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
contents of enclosure 
(2), the Board finds the existence of an
following corrective action.

and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

Docket No: 42 16-00

a.

Petitioner was promoted to 

paygrade E-6 effective 30 November 1968.

- receipt of the monies is waived. Petitioner ’s retired pay is already based on 

In the event
Petitioner was promoted on an earlier date and received monies based on an earlier effective
paygrade
date 
E-6, this correction is made so that the service record will have a record and show that the
Petitioner was indeed promoted to 
reason of physical disability.
was promoted to 

Petitioner will be furnished a promotion warrant showing he

paygrade E-6 prior to being permanently retired by

paygrade E-6 effective 30 November 1968.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D.
Recorder

ZSALMAN

Px-+
GL
ADAMS
G. L.
Acting Recorder

to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5. Pursuant
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

21 March 2001



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00042-01

    Original file (00042-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01833-01

    Original file (01833-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Approved findings, conclusions and recommendations of BCNR, less enclosures In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has 1. reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. The Regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy, require that the naval record of subject to be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the approved recommendation of the Board as contained in enclosure (1). Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08431-00

    Original file (08431-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Exnicios, and Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05077-00

    Original file (05077-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to promotion to a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Mathews, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08628-00

    Original file (08628-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07897-00

    Original file (07897-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07990-00

    Original file (07990-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07928-00

    Original file (07928-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05127-01

    Original file (05127-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Exnicios, and Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07448-01

    Original file (07448-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments MMER MSG 3 Subject’s naval record 10542 OCT 00 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible. consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No:...