DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 4 187-02
26 November 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 29 October 1976
to 24 May 1978, when you were discharged under honorable conditions by reason of
unsuitability, based on a hysterical personality.
of recurrent episodes of extreme anxiety, tremulousness and hyperventilation since you were
Following your discharge, the Veterans Administration denied your
seven years of age.
request for service connection for a number of conditions, and granted you 0% ratings for
calluses and a
fungal infection of your feet.
The Board noted that you disclosed a history
In the absence of evidence which indicates that you were unfit for duty because of a physical
disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of service in the Marine
Corps, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Accordingly,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03219-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00307-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 5 May 1998, and were assigned to a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01450-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 24 July 1969 to 4 June 1970, when you were discharged under honorable condition by reason of unsuitability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00485-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04342-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, service in the Naval Reserve and your initial period of good service in the Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09022-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. this’Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03507-02
December 1997, the PEB made preliminary findings that you remained unfit for duty, and that your disability was ratable at 20%. VA code 527 1 provides for a 20% rating for marked limitation of motion of the ankle, and 10% for moderate limitation of motion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06985-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2011. You served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 19 August to 29 October 2002, when you were discharged for the convenience of the government by reason of a condition not a disability, with an uncharacterized entry level separation (ELS). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02684-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested fitness report. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05429-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Apparently in 2002, you realized that with 21 years of total service in the Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve, you might be eligible for reserve retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...