Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03742-02
Original file (03742-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TJR
Docket  No: 3742-02
20 November  2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 12 November 1942 at the age of 17. At
the time of enlistment you had completed 10 years of formal
education.

On 24 November 1943 you were convicted by general court-martial
(GCM) of a 62 day period of unauthorized absence (UA).
sentenced to confinement for three months, and a bad conduct
(BCD).
discharge 
However, you were placed on probation and
restored to duty.
On 24 April 1944 you were convicted by GCM of
a 20 day period of UA and sentenced to confinement for 15 months
and a BCD.
duty.

Again you were placed on probation and restored to

You were

On 21 March 1944 you were convicted by GCM of a 117 day period of
UA.
in rate, and a BCD.
The BCD was subsequently approved at all
levels of review, and on 1 March 1946 you were so discharged.

You were sentenced to confinement for 24 months, reduction

The Board, in its review of  your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and your contention that your discharge
should be upgraded because you completed your enlistment and
fought in World War II.
factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge because of your repetitive
and lengthy periods of UA during wartime.
Further, the Board
courts-
noted that you were sentenced to a BCD at two earlier
martial but were restored to duty, thus giving you the
opportunity to earn a better characterization of service.
However, you failed to do so and committed further offenses.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.

Nevertheless, the Board concluded these

 

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of  
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

regularity.attaches  to all official records.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02770-02

    Original file (02770-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. April 1945 you received CM on two occasions for missing muster, On 22 March 1945 the DD was mitigated to a bad conduct On 3 February 1945 the confinement You were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05504-01

    Original file (05504-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 27 August 1943 you were convicted by general On 25 May 1943 you began a 67 day period of UA that was not terminated until you were apprehended by civil authorities on 31 July 1943. court-martial (GCM) of the foregoing period of UA and were sentenced, as mitigated, to confinement for 18...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2672-13

    Original file (NR2672-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01249-08

    Original file (01249-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 25 March 1945, you began another period of UA when you failed to comply with orders.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02472-01

    Original file (02472-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At that time, a conviction by GCM precluded the issuance of an honorable discharge. Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board However, the Board concluded these Accordingly, your application has been denied.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05757-00

    Original file (05757-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 December 1944 you were convicted by deck court On 18 October and on 3 November 1944 you received During the period from 12 February to 20 June 1945 you were convicted by DC on three occasions for a two day period of unauthorized absence (UA), drunkenness, and absence from your appointed place of duty. 15 months, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD). evidence in your record, and you submitted none, to support your contention that you were told that the discharge would be Even if you were,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06948-08

    Original file (06948-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 6948-08 25 November 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, applied to this Board requesting to upgrade the bad conduct discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04007-09

    Original file (04007-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 9 September 1945, you began another period of UA that was not terminated until 6 November 1945. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13393-09

    Original file (13393-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2844-13

    Original file (NR2844-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 January 1947, you received deck court (DC) for two periods of UA.