Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03512-02
Original file (03512-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

TJR
Docket No:   3512-02
6 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You serve for two years and three months without

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 3 January 1966 at the age of
18.
disciplinary incident but on 5 March 1968 you began a 27 day
period of unauthorized absence (UA) that was not terminated until
1 April 1968.

On 4 April 1968 you began another period of UA that was not
terminated until January 1975.
Subsequently, you submitted a
written for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by
court-martial for the foregoing period of UA totalling six years,
10 months, and 24 days.
submitting this request, you conferred with a qualified military
lawyer at which time you were advised of your rights and warned
of the probable adverse consequences of accepting such a
discharge.
alternate service program in accordance with Presidential
Proclamation 4313.
cormnanding officer was directed to issue you an undesirable
discharge by reason of the good of the service.
this action, you were spared the stigma of a court-martial

At this same time you requested participation in the

Your requests were granted and your

Your record shows that prior to

As a result of

conviction and the potential penalties of a punitive discharge
and confinement at hard labor.
issued an undesirable discharge.

On 29 January 1975 you were

At that time you were issued a

On 19 May 1976, upon completion of your alternate service and in
accordance with a recommendation of the Presidential Clemency
Board, your BCD was changed to a clemency discharge pursuant to
Presidential Proclamation 4313.
clemency discharge certificate.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity, time served in Vietnam, and your
contentions of mental disorders and physical problems.
Nevertheless, these factors and contentions were not sufficient
to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the
seriousness of your very lengthy period of UA and your request
for discharge to avoid trial for this offense.
Further, the
Board noted that the undesirable discharge was changed to a
clemency discharge, but concluded that a further change was not
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04827-02

    Original file (04827-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, the Board also noted that you were terminated from the program of alternate service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10686-09

    Original file (10686-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of | your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 December 1970, you submitted a written request to be discharged for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the periods of UA.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04468-01

    Original file (04468-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. At that time you agreed to serve 15 months of Your request for On 19 November 1976 your enrollment in the Reconciliation Service Program, in accordance with your agreement of 14 January 1975, was terminated due to your failure to complete the required period of alternate service. However,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04684-00

    Original file (04684-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your lengthy period of UA and your failure to complete the alternate service required for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04835-08

    Original file (04835-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068435C070402

    Original file (2002068435C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He again went AWOL on 6 July 1968 and remained absent until he contacted military authorities on 3 October 1974, requesting that he be allowed to participate in the program established under Presidential Proclamation 4313. On 20 January 1975, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313, dated 16 September 1974. The Clemency Discharge is a neutral discharge, issued neither under “honorable conditions”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069012C070402

    Original file (2002069012C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant acknowledged that he understood that within 15 days of receipt of the Undesirable Discharge Certificate, he must report to his State Director of Selective Service to arrange for performance of an alternate service. On 31 January 1975, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under President Proclamation 4313, for the good of service with a UD.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06612-09

    Original file (06612-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058983C070421

    Original file (2001058983C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He also indicated that he understood that he was required to report to the State Director of Selective Service within 15 days of discharge for performance of alternate service and that upon satisfactory completion of such service he would be issued a Clemency Discharge Certificate and that the certificate did not alter his ineligibility for benefits The last group could...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060542C070421

    Original file (2001060542C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Evidence of record shows the applicant failed to complete his required period of alternate service in accordance with the provisions of Presidential Proclamation Number 4313.