DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No:
29 January 2003
2911-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 January 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8
October 1980.
nonjudicial punishments.
absences totalling six days,
duty, failure to obey a lawful order,
property.
The record reflects that you received two
The offenses included unauthorized
and damaging government
absence from your appointed place of
On 10 March 1982 you submitted a written request for an other
than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial
for an unauthorized absence of 40 days.
request you conferred with a qualified military lawyer at which
were,advised of your rights and warned of the probable
time you
adverse consequences of accepting such a discharge.
was granted and, as a result of this action, you were spared the
stigma of a court-martial conviction and the potential penalties
of a punitive discharge and confinement at hard labor.
received the other than honorable discharge on 26 March 1982. At
that time, you were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Prior to submitting this
Your request
You
However, the Board found that these factors were not
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given
your request for discharge to avoid trial for an unauthorized
absence of more than a month,
actions.
extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by
court-martial was approved since, by this action, you escaped the
possibility of confinement at hard labor and a punitive
discharge.
benefit of your bargain when your request for discharge was
granted and should not be permitted to change it now.
the Board concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Further, the Board concluded that you received the
The Board believed that considerable clemency was
and your two prior disciplinary
all
Therefore,
The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is
discharged in lieu of court-martial.
no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not
find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment
code.
Since you have been treated
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01386-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was granted and, as a result of this court- Prior to You received the other than honorable In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, and the contention that alcohol abuse caused your misconduct. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02156-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 October 2001 at age 17. However, the reason for discharge entered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10449-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 9 November 1979 after more than two...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06291-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military record shows that you submitted a written request for a discharge under other than honorable conditions in order to avoid trial by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07666-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. unauthorized absence of about seven days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06456-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your lengthy unauthorized absence and especially your request for discharge to avoid trial for this offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 5024-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. While the request is not in your record, it is presumed that you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the foregoing offenses. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08406-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board believed that Your request You Further, the Board concluded Accordingly, your application considerable clemency was extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08425-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After each of the first four periods of unauthorized absence you were counseled, warned of the possible consequences of further misconduct,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10961-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your frequent misconduct, which resulted in five NJPs and your lengthy period of UA which resulted in your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying...