DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC: ddj
Docket No: 2848-02
10 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 10 September 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum
is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Your allegations of error and injustice were
4050.1s LPD 2 WC of 30 April 2002, a copy of which
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775
IN REPLY REFER TO
4050.1s
LPD-2-WC
30 Apr 02
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
OF NAVAL RECORDS
BOARD FOR CORRECTION
Subj:
CORPORAL
Ref:
(a) Joint Federal Travel Regulations
Corporal
1.
elected to move his personal property
via the Do-It-Y
Traffic Management
personnel counseled him on 19 June 1999 on his entitlement,
and the counseling session was annotated on a DD Form
2278(Application For Do It Yourself Move And Counseling
Checklist).
(DITY) program.
(TMO) to arrange their own move the Marine is
When a Marine is directed by the Traffic Management
2.
Office
provided a letter from
actual expenses because
movement of the personal property with a commercial mover,
they are not counseled and given a DD Form 2278.
When a
TM0 of their intention to arrange their own
Marine advises
move they are given a letter authorizing reimbursement up
to the authorized Government costs.
TM0 authorizing reimbursement of
TM0 was unable to arrange the
3.
an advance o
move
company $6197.38 to move his 8,000 pounds of personal
property.
ned the DD Form 2278 and accepted
wance of $786.00 to perform a DITY
chose to pay a commercial moving
_
The Government would have paid a commercial moving
4.
company $2300.00 to move 8,000 pound of personal
from North Carolina to Virginia.
paid the maximum amount of $2300.00 allowed by the
Government.
Corporal4
MEMORANRUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
This Headquarters has determined that Corporal
5.
was properly counseled and reimbursed all authorized
expenditures and we are unable to recommend a favorable
determination of this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03272-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. old Traffic Management personnel that Florida, however he instead Corporal 3. his move, based on his estimated weight and that he would be moving to Florida. MEMORANRUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS This Headquarters has determined that the DITY portion 6. of the Pay Adjustment Authorization is correct as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006637
The applicant requests reimbursement for his personally procured move (PPM) move from Fort Huachuca, AZ, to Fort Campbell, KY. 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving at Fort Huachuca when he was issued PCS orders in December 2014 reassigning him to Fort Campbell. On 19 December 2014, he was properly counseled at Fort Huachuca on the PPM program to include his entitlements, his responsibilities, and the documentation required to submit a claim for a PPM move.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026099
The member rents normal types of rental vehicles, equipment, moving aids, and packing material and the member performs all labor for the move. The evidence of record shows the applicant was authorized to perform a PPM from Fort Richardson to Fort Carson. It is reasonable to presume that had the applicant actually performed the move himself, without the aid of ABF, there would not have been an issue with his claim and he would have been entitled to the advance payment, as well as his full...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010566
The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his PCS Orders; DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave), dated 3 May 2006; DD Form 2278 (Application for DITY and Counseling Checklist); FHT Form 55-X25 (DITY Information Data Sheet); Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Travel Voucher, dated 12 May 2006, with a copy of his DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 May 2006; DFAS Travel Voucher, dated 11 May 2009; DITY Checklist and Certification of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006328
The applicant states: * as directed by permanent change of station (PCS) orders, he was required to move from Fort Carson to Fort Leonard Wood * he requested a PPM instead of having the government move his household goods (HHG) * as a requirement for claiming travel expenses, he had his moving truck weighed full near Kansas City, MO * at one point during his family's travels to Fort Leonard Wood, he stopped to assist his wife with the care of their then 3-month old daughter * while assisting...
d. Paragraph U-5330-G, JFTR provides, in part, for shipment of household goods in advance of orders, however, the Comptroller General has ruled that general information furnished to the member concerning issuance of orders before the determination is 2 AFBCMR 9 6 - 0 2 0 1 3 made to actually issue the orders (such as time of eventual release from active duty, time of expiration of term of service, date of eligibility for retirement, date of expected rotation from overseas duty) may not be...
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1 104 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Larch 1998; and competent authority approved his DD Form 2278, Application for Do-It-Yourself P I T Y ) Move and Counseling Checklist, dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003141
On 7 March 2011, DFAS sent a letter to the applicant's home of record address in Lake Worth, FL, notifying him that records in the Travel Division showed he had received monies from the U.S. Government for his move as an advance under travel orders, dated 8 March 2010. e. A DD Form 1351-2, dated 23 November 2011, whereon he indicated he had received a previous government advance in the amount of $5,510.30 and he claimed he had incurred a rental vehicle expense in the amount of $2,563.00 in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026758
The applicant requests, in effect, reimbursement for the personally-procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG), based on 95 percent (%) of the Government Constructed Cost (GCC) and in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), and that the estimated gross incentive (95% reimbursement estimate) cited on his DD Form 2278 (Application for Do It Yourself (DITY) Move and Counseling Checklist), dated 25 January 2010, be used instead of the estimated gross incentive cited on...
He received prior authorization to perform a Do-It- Yourself (DITY) move; he received proper DITY move counseling; he completed a DD form 2278, DITY Counseling Checklist, prior to the movement of his personal property in connection with his move to St. Louis, Missouri; and, his incentive was based on the rates in effect in June 1998. There is no statutory authority for a member to move personal property at govemment expense prior to receipt of orders unless the request for transportation is...