Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02795-01
Original file (02795-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV

Y

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

S

JRE
Docket No:  
17 September 2002

279501

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance  
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Commandant of the Marine Corps dated 10
September 2001, a copy of which is attached, and your response thereto.

*with administrative regulations and procedures

Documentary material considered by the Board

Although your transfer could have been

In this regard, the Board noted that a medical board would not

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. The Board noted that your transfer from an active status in the
Marine Corps Reserve was mandated by statute.
deferred, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Navy, it does not appear that such action
was warranted in your case.
have been initiated unless cognizant medical personnel determined that your condition was
severe enough to have overcome the presumption of fitness which applies to service members
pending non-disability retirement. The presumption, which is defined in SECNAVINST
1850.4D, paragraph 3305, which was in effect at the time in question, would be overcome
where a preponderance of evidence established that within the presumptive period, an acute,
grave illness or injury occurred that would have prevented the service member from
performing further duty if the member were not retiring.
considered to have been overcome in those cases where the member had an otherwise
unfitting medical condition and, based on accepted medical principles, the natural progression
of that condition normally results in either significant life-span reduction/death or

The presumption of fitness was

deterioration to the point where it could warrant a permanent disability rating of 60 percent.
It is clear that your knee condition was not severe enough to have overcome the presumption
of fitness.

In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and votes of the

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
D

3280 RUSSELL ROA

QUANTICO.  VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0

Y

3

IN REPLY

 

REFER  

TO:

177 0
RAM-3

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR  

NAVAL RECORDS

SORRECYION  

3F

Subj :

KEQIJEST

FOR COMMENTS AND  

RECOMMENDATlONS

IN THE

Ret:

Enc  

1 
:

MC0  

(a) 
(b) Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 14506

P1900.16

(1) Copy of RA Div Comment of 19 Mar 
(2) Copy of CMC 

Oi
ltr  1770 RAM-3/D of 5 Mar 

01

1.

As previously explained in enclosure  

(l),  which responded

 

of-

(NOE)

if

 
The law

essional Inquiry submitted on behalf
references (a) and (b) outline the regulations
pertaining to Marines in receipt of Notice of Eligibility
Benefits when a mandatory retirement date arrives.
al.Lows  for modification of a mandatory retirement date only
the Marine is hospitalized or a medical board report has been
received by the Physical Evaluation Board  
date of retirement.
had the major's benefits been requested immediately after his
injury,
a medical board would still not have been convened by
the time his mandatory retirement date arrived.
since a medical board was not in the hands of the PEB by
1 February   2001,
benefits were terminated,
for the period during which he was eligible.
terminated NOE benefits
his command,

his retirement date was executed, his NOE

the Marine Corps Reserve Support Command.

and his incapacitation pay was paid
Enclosure (2)

Also,

as stated in a previous response,

for

 

(PEB),  prior to the

Consequently,

and was forwarded to

his service-incurred injury,
with the Veterans Administration.

is still in need of medical treatment for

he is eligible to file a claim

This Headquarters recommends that

3.
a retired status,

in accordance with references

remain in
and

(b).

(a)

Subj:

4.

The point of contact at this

'lity

(NOE) Benefits is

703-784-0512.

Headquarters

for Notice of

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05132-00

    Original file (05132-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member had a board of flight surgeons in disability from the VA for a "spinal disc but the member complained of It must be noted The member appealed that The member has been The member testified that all his fitness reports were in the top 1% until he stopped drilling in March 1997. that his cessation of drilling status was secondary to his neck surgery. during which time the member was not on active duty in This is consistent with the member's having been there was no opportunity for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04372-02

    Original file (04372-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your back condition to Navy or Marine Corps officials after you underwent spinal disc surgery in 1990. The Board noted that although you suffered acute exacerbations of your back condition during periods of military duty in 1997 and 1999, you did not sustain any significant trauma to your spine during those , and there was permanent aggravation of the preexisting periods, you were not “injured” The exacerbations of your condition, one condition during those periods of military duty. VASRD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04103-01

    Original file (04103-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was not released from active duty on 26 February 200 1, and that he be retained on active duty until his medical problems are corrected. ” A pain clinic note dated 26 February 2001 indicates that Petitioner had pain radiating from his lower back to his legs, right greater than left, with an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12634-10

    Original file (12634-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. The Board found that it is not in the interests of justice to excuse the three year time limit in your particular case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018078

    Original file (20140018078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 January 2014, the VA awarded him service-connected disability compensation for multiple conditions, including PTSD, TBI, migraine, degenerative joint disease (left shoulder and right knee), tinnitus, and other conditions. The presumption of fitness may be overcome when: (a) an illness or injury occurs within the presumptive period that would prevent the Service member from performing further duty if they were not retiring; (b) a serious deterioration of a previously diagnosed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013773

    Original file (20140013773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Presumption of Fitness – Application). The presumption of fitness may be overcome when: (a) an illness or injury occurs within the presumptive period that would prevent the service member from performing further duty if he or she is not retiring; (b) a serious deterioration of a previously-diagnosed condition, including a chronic one, occurs within the presumptive period, and the deterioration would preclude further duty if the service member were not retiring; or (c) the condition for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06756-98

    Original file (06756-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Retirement Policy which states that Marines in the grade of Gunnery Sergeant or above, must serve two years in their current pay grade prior to transfer to retirement status. 6756-98 Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery 1. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery Sergeant petition with regard to his retirement rank.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000643

    Original file (20140000643.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There was no LD determination in his case file. It states that eligible Soldiers must request the memorandum through command channels to HRC, and certain information, to include the results of the PEB and a copy of the order reassigning the Soldier to the Retired Reserve, with the instructions therein that the Soldier is authorized early retirement under 10 USC 12731b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04434-02

    Original file (04434-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance applicable to the proceedings of this Board. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00991-02

    Original file (00991-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result of this endorsement and Corporal request for a report date of 23 February 2001, CMC (RAM-2) published a set of orders on 17 January 2001 for Corporal Newsome ordering him to active duty (Enclosure (3)) effective 23 February 2001. Selected Marine Corps Reserve, accession to the AR program may disqualify you from this assignment. 36-month tour of active duty with the AR program to fill the following position: QUALITY ASSURANCE (6336) FORT WORTH TX 8820A...