Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02754-02
Original file (02754-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

TJR
Docket No: 2754-02
13 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 January 1982 at the age of
18 and served for nearly two years without disciplinary incident.
However, on 9 January 1984 you received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for wrongful use of cocaine and were awarded a $384
forfeiture of pay, restriction for 21 days, and reduction to
paygrade  E-2.

Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative
separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. At
that time you waived your right to consult with legal counsel and
to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
January 1984 your commanding officer recommended an other than
honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
stated, in part, as follows:

This recommendation

On 11

Although this was Member's first offense, the use of cocaine
by a Marine will not be tolerated.
abstain from drugs is unacceptable and is a detriment to
good order and discipline.

His reluctance to

On 19 January 1984 the discharge authority directed an other than
honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 31 January
1984 you were so discharged.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity,
conduct and proficiency marks, and
your contention that your discharge is a blemish that you should
not have to bear for the rest of your life.
Nevertheless, the
Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient
to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your
drug related misconduct.
denied.

Accordingly, your application has been

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07093-01

    Original file (07093-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record, use of marijuana, and use of cocaine while in a surveillance program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04182-02

    Original file (04182-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10625-06

    Original file (10625-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 6 September 1984 you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 19. On 9 July 1985 you were counseled...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02118-02

    Original file (02118-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Shortly thereafter, on 19 February 1987, you were notified that administrative separation action had been initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your use of cocaine and marijuana. Immediate administrative Failure to This recommendation further stated that your two On 27 February 1987 your commanding officer recommended an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01929-07

    Original file (01929-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 17 August 1982, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19. In connection with this processing, you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04990-01

    Original file (04990-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 May 1990 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. concluded these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change in your reason for separation or reenlistment code...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04122-08

    Original file (04122-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 8 June 1985, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed a general discharge by reason of misconduct due...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00440-08

    Original file (00440-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of your misconduct that continued even after...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0648 13

    Original file (NR0648 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official haval record, the burden is on the applicant: to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03831-01

    Original file (03831-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 9 February 1984 at the age of 18. concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change of your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code because of your drug related misconduct and your failure to maintain a satisfactory drilling status. your case, the Board concluded your discharge, narrative reason for separation, and reenlistment code were proper as...