DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No. 2698-02
28 August 2002
From:
To:
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
OF
Ref:
Encl:
(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
1.
former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.
The Board, consisting
bf Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and
2.
Pauling, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 28 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a.
Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
Petitioner's application to the Board was filed in a
timely manner.
c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 1997 for four
Petitioner was advanced to
years at age 25 in pay grade E-l.
petty officer third class on 16 December 1999 and served without
incident while on active duty.
d.
During almost two years of service as a third class petty
officer, Petitioner received four performance evaluations that
t&it averages of 3.00, 3.00, 3.14, and 3.00,
assigned overall
respectively.
November 2000 completed on the USS KITTY HAWK (CV-63) assigned
The evaluation for the period of 16 June 2000 to 1
@@Teamwork", which was rated as 4.0.
performance trait marks of 3.0 in all performance categories with
the exception of
commanding officer remarked that
significant impact on KITTY HAWK's
readiness" and "(Petitioner) has been a valuable team player with
virtually unlimited potential."
recommended him for retention and for advancement in the
"Promotable11 grouping.
The commanding officer also
"(Petitioner) has had a
The
. .
. and damage control
e.
Petitioner was released from active duty on 16 June 2001
due to the completion of required active service and transferred
to the naval reserve and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
CONCLUSION:
It appears to the Board that Petitioner may have been
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
issued an RE-4 reenlistment code due to administrative error and
not due to the commanding officer's non-recommendation for
reenlistment.
on the last four performance evaluations, and concludes that
Petitioner was clearly recommended for retention and advancement.
Without substantial documentation that states that he was not
recommended for advancement or reenlistment, the Board believes
that assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code was unjust, given
his apparent eligibility for the more favorable RE-1 reenlistment
code.
an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
In this regard, the Board notes the average marks
In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of
RECOMMENDATION:
a.
the RE-4 reenlistment code,
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing
assigned on 16 June 2001, to RE-1.
b.
That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
C .
That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with
a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
2
It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
4.
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
A&$!y5p/
Acting Recorder
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
5 .
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
_
W. DEAN PF
Executive Dire
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00451-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. In order to receive an RE-3R reenlistment code, a Sailor must be recommended for advancement or be promotable. Based on the foregoing, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s record does not warrant the worst reenlistment code of RE-4, and that code should be changed to RE-3R.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09724-06
This is the same belief of my chain of command as seen in enclosure (12). Enclosures (13) and (14), are my NJP proceedings.3. Supervision of all Intelligence Department ratings while managing some of the Navy’s most sensitive programs for Commander Submarine Group Seven.Subj: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF ADVERSE EVALUATION AND REINSTATEMENT OF CHIEF PETTY OFFICER (CPO) SELECTIONOfficer.
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500682
Civilian counsel did not submit issues. directed the Applicant's discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern or misconduct PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20041003 by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has met the standard for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03354-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. Punishment imposed was forfeitures paygrade E-2, and The restriction and extra f& two months, reduction to Petitioner served without .1990 for d. On 8 October 1994, Petitioner received NJP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03460-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board consisting ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 10 June 2005, Petitioner signed an enlisted performance evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03581-02
growth criteria, officer third class, be serving in examination for advancement to recommended for advancement, officer in the current enlistment and be currently recommended for advancement to CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable It appears to the Board that Petitioner was issued an action. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600584
*Third set of Performance and Behavior marks extracted from supporting documents submitted by the Applicant (page 1 only) Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600). Pt stated that he has had suicidal thoughts since a kid but denied any plans or attempts. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01172-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand why he was assigned an RE-1 reenlistment code, contrary to the recommendation in the last performance evaluation. That Petitioner's naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07180-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marines Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Mr and Mr reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The reenlistment code of RE-4 means that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00502-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 00502-11 18 Octeber 2011 -From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF (Qi: Ref: (a) 100.8.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for retention} reentry code. That...