Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01906-01
Original file (01906-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

CRS
Docket No: 1906-01
12 April 2001

Your allegations of error and

and wrongful appropriation.

Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious  
considerat.ion  of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 June 1997 at
The record reflects that you received three nonjudicial
age 18.
punishments.
insubordination, larceny,
The commanding officer then recommended that you be separated
with a general discharge by reason of unsatisfactory performance.
you elected to waive your
When informed of the recommendation,
right to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for
separation was approved and you were discharged with a general
At that time you were assigned a
discharge on 29 April 1999.
reenlistment code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of
unsatisfactory performance.
differently than others in your situation, the Board could not
find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment

The offenses included an unauthorized absence,

Since you have been treated no

The names

You are entitled to have the

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

code.
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed, since you did not ask for such
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05122-01

    Original file (05122-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 20 March 1998 you were discharged with an other than honorable At that time you were assigned a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02565-10

    Original file (02565-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2010. Since your discharge is less than 15 years old, you may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible upgrade. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04759-02

    Original file (04759-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contract required...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01038-01

    Original file (01038-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    in-charge (OINC) recommended to the discharge authority that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation. of your scheduled active duty for training and had sufficient time to make arrangements for child care, but you did not make the unit aware of problems until after your missed a drill and the period of active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02881-02

    Original file (02881-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Shortly thereafter, on 28 April 1998, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of weight control failure. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these Regarding your contention that you elected your right to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), the Board noted that when an individual is being processed for separation he is entitled to request an ADB due to weight control failure, Since you only if he has six or more years of active service....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05622-02

    Original file (05622-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. enlistment contract required you to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. Accordingly, your application The names and votes of the members of the panel An individual separated with such a The Board did not consider whether your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07192-02

    Original file (07192-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together-with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the recommendation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03398-09

    Original file (03398-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02002-01

    Original file (02002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 CRS Docket No: 2002-01 5 April 2001 _. Dear This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01682-01

    Original file (01682-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with a general discharge by reason of misconduct on 7 March 1995. Applicable regulations reenlistment code when Since you misconduct. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).