Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01230-02
Original file (01230-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
LCC: lc
Docket No: 1230-02
26 February 2002

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)
(3)

DD Form 149 w/attachments
CMC MMPR-2 MSG 04 18532 DEC 01
Subject’s naval record

Pursuant to -the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,

1.
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show promoted when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Lippolis, and Ms.
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, 
available 
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

determined.Jhat the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the

evidsnce of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the

 

LeBlanc, reviewed

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

.

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

In correspondence attached as enclosure  

(2), the office having cognizance over the

subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure  
following corrective action.

(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

Docket No: 1230-02

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected,  where appropriate, to show that:

a.

Petitioner was promoted to  

paygrade E-6 effective 1 January 2001.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder 
*

_ 

G&b=--

G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

26 February 2002



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01020-02

    Original file (01020-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    LCC: lc Docket No: 1020-02 26 February 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01048-02

    Original file (01048-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, allegations of error and injustice on 12 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01856-02

    Original file (01856-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00522-02

    Original file (00522-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, allegations of error and injustice on 12 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board, having...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01894-02

    Original file (01894-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments CMC memorandum R 26 18372 DEC 01 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2002 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00095-02

    Original file (00095-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00099-02

    Original file (00099-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00054-02

    Original file (00054-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with-this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00918-02

    Original file (00918-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the pravisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00262-02

    Original file (00262-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ’s application has commentecl to the effect that the CONCLUSIO N Upon review and consideration contents of enclosure following corrective action. of‘ all the evidence of record, (2), the Board finds the existence of an and especially in light of the iii_jiistice warranting the RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner will be given reineclial proinotion consideration for promotion to paygrade Docket No: 262-02 2000 Active...