DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NA‘JAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0 TRG
Docket No:
6 June 2001
8640-00
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
RECORD
OF -
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Pursuant to the provisions of
1.
enlisted member of the United States 'Naval Reserve filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be
corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4
reenlistment code assigned on 11
Octo'ber 1997.
refarence (a), Petitioner, an
The Board, consisting of Mr. Shy, Mr. Morgan and Mr. Mazza,
2.
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30
May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a.
Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
C .
Petitioner enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 1 July 1994
at age 23 and reported for three years of active duty on
October 1994.
2 March 1995 reported to the USS REID (FFG 30).
that he was advanced to FN (E-3), received letters of
appreciation and, was commended by the commanding officer for his
professionalism and devotion to duty.
He successfully completed initial training and on
The record shows
12
d.
In the performance evaluation for the period 16 July to
11 October 1997, Petitioner was assigned no marks below 3.0 and
the individual trait average is 3.67.
The evaluation comments
"his attitude and ability to work with others is
state that
exemplary." He was recommended for promotion and retention in the
Navy.
his service characterized as honorable.
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
He was released from active duty on 11 October 1997 with
At that time, he was
e.
Petitioner believes the
reenl_istment code was assigned
in error because he has an excellent record and there is no basis
for the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
f.
Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3R
reenlistment code when an individual does not meet professional
growth criteria by at least passing an advancement examination
prior to the completion of an initial period of extended active
duty.
probationary reenlistment,
petty officer.
RE-1 reenlistment code if an individual passed the advancement
examination but was not advanced.
Regulations would allow for the assignment of an
during which he must be advanced to
That code means an individual
:LS recommended for a
CONCLUSION:
The Board notes Petitioner's excellent record and
Upon review and consideration of all
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
concludes that there is no basis for
and it must have been assigned in error.
no evidence that he passed an advancement examination, the RE-4
reenlistment code should be changed to RE-3R and not RE-1.
l:he evidence of record the
':he RE-4 reenlistment code
However, since there is
RECOMMENDATION:
a.
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by issuing a DD
Form 215 to show that he was assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code
on 11 October 1997 vice the RE-4
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to
removed or completely
the Board's recommendation be corrected,
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.
reen:Listment code now of record.
C . That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board,
of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained
for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner's naval record.
together with this Report
It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
4.
review and deliberations,
and that the foregoing is a true and
2
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D.
Recorder
ZSALMAN
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with
its provisions; it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Fak
w. DEAN
Executive Director
PFEIFFER
3
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00263-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing the reenlistment code. because he had completed his three years of active duty, there was no time to take an advancement examination for The Board paygrade E-4. (e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (2 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e)) and having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04163-01
However, given the circumstances, especially his fine performance of duty, the Board concludes that an RE-1 reenlistment code should be assigned in this case as an exception to policy. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 24 July 2000 he was assigned an RE-1 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00085-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 7 December 1989. The page 9 shows that in the evaluation for the period ending 7 December 1989, he was assigned marginal marks of 3.0 in the categories of reliability and personal behavior. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03581-02
growth criteria, officer third class, be serving in examination for advancement to recommended for advancement, officer in the current enlistment and be currently recommended for advancement to CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable It appears to the Board that Petitioner was issued an action. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4679 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code, which was issued on 13 April 2013. At that time he was recommended for promotion and continued service in the Navy Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reentry code. Such a code may also be assigned if the commanding officer does not recommend the individual for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02256-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 2256-09 25 January 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD 02y@———_RAadiazil Ret: (a) dQ U.S.C. The Board also takes into account Petitioner's record, which reflects honorable service and the lack of documentation specifying why he was not recommended for retention, advancement, or reenlistment. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11022-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 11022-10 28 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tor Secretary of the Navy subs REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1¢0 (9 Ref: (a) 10 U.8.€. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. ae......
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10267-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, applied to this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2. Petitioner then served without incident and was promoted to pay grade E-3 on 16 October 1992 e. On 31 March 1993 Petitioner was honorably released from active duty due to completion of active obligated service and assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code.f. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09446-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2. The Board, consisting of Mr.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of errbr and injustice on 2 May 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. At that time he was assigned and RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08516-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 08516-07 17 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF él Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record -1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with...