DEPARTMENT OF
TI-W NAVY
BOARD FOR
CORRECTIh+i OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD: hd
Docket No: 0862540
13 July 2001
Dear Lieute
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 February 2001, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
c&e&on of an official naval record, the
I
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT
OF/THE NAV Y
NAVY
PERSQF(NEL COMMAN
5720
RITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON 3 N 38055000
INTE
D
0
1610
PERS-3 11
23 February 2001
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS/BCNR Coordinator (PERS-OOZCB)
Ref:
(a) BUPERSINST 1610.10 EVAL Manual
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
1. Enclosure (1) is returned. The member requests the removal of his fitness report for the
period 1 September 1997 to 5 June 1998.
2. Based on our review of the material provided, we find the following:
a. A review of the member
’s headquarters record revealed the report in question to be on file.
b. The fitness report in question is a Detachment of Reporting Senior/Concurrent report. The
member stated the reverse side
had an opportunity to view or sign the report.
.on the report is missing
from his digitized record and he never
c. Both sides of the report are reflected in the member
’s digitized record. The report is a
Concurrent report and is signed by the reporting senior and the regular reporting senior, however,
the member ’s signature is missing.Per reference (a), Annex E;
member should be counseled and the signature obtained, but the signature ‘is not required unless
the report is adverse. W e are in the process of returning a copy of the report to the member for
his signature.
“On a concurrent report, the
d. The member does not prove the report to be unjust or in error.
3. W e recommend the member
we will replace the unsigned copy with the signed copy.
’s record remain unchanged. When the signed report is returned
Head, Performance
Evaluation Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01424-02
Your request to remove the concurrent fitness report for 27 September 2000 to 11 April 2001 was not considered, as the Navy Personnel Command record, to get the regular reporting senior’s signature on the report and his endorsement on ’ your rebuttal. member ’s statement and the reporting senior for the report ending 11 April 2001. A fitness report does not have to be consistent g. Lieuten m his previous provided several letters of support and one fro reporting senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05059-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The members requests the removal of his fitness report for the 2. The member record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07920-00
That Petj.tioner’s naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report and related material: Date of Report Reporting Senior 98SepO3 Period of Report From To b. On 13 November 1999 the report was The report was returned to the reporting senior for correction and resubmission. A review of the member ’s headquarters record revealed The report was received without the member returned to the reporting senior for correction and tracer action was initiated and the report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05844-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The member’s statement to the record concerning all three fitness reports is properly reflected in his digitized record with the reporting senior’s endorsement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07125-00
The member alleges an administrative error was made on his fitness report in question concerning his promotion recommendation. c. The member and the reporting senior refer to changes to the fitness report in question as administrative changes. is returned concurr 5420 Pers 85 27 Mar 01 ings of NR The fitness report dated 14 Jul 98 2. have affected the FY-00 Active Duty Captain Line Promotion Selection Board, as it The FY-01 board would have been the first convened 14 Jan 99. to review the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00924-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The member alleges the copy of the concurrent report provided with her petition was mandatory, when the new reporting senior reported onboard she was already TAD, if block- 16 is not marked and any trait is graded, the report is considered observed and all traits must be graded or marked NOB,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07328-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2008. Additionally, the member requests he be provided with two (2) fitness reports for the same period. The member alleges the fitness report includes a period that should have been reported on by another reporting senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06208-00
” This report reflects that both the “5.0” (highest), two of “4.0” (second best) “5.0, ” two of “4.0” and two of “3.0”; and it f. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), PERS-311, the Navy Personnel (NPC) office having cognizance over officer fitness reports, stated that the report Command for 1 February 1998 to 3 1 January 1999 was received and placed in Petitioner record on 5 August 1999; that the FY 00 selection board convened on 24 May 1999 and adjourned 4 June 1999; and that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00087-98
states that he signed a "Concurrent" on 14 November 1997, of "Early Promote"; however, report from his regular reporting senior, "Periodic Regular" which he received a promotion recommendation of "Progressing". comments in block 43 of the report in question, that the evaluation being submitted is based on the input from the member's TAD command. The reporting senior d. Based on our review, we feel the reporting senior assigned the member a promotion recommendation of "Progressing" due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08041-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The member provided a copy of her statement and reporting senior’s endorsement with her petition. When the member’s statement and reporting senior’s endorsement is returned and found suitable for filing, we will place it in the member’s digitized record.