Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07322-99
Original file (07322-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR  

CORREC;ION  OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

CRS
Docket No: 7322-99
11 July 2000

Dear-

This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.

application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United

Your allegations of error and

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 July 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
of'this
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
opinion furnished by the Military Awards Branch of Headquarters
'Marine Corps dated 8 May 2000, a copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

In this connection, the Board substantially

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2

1650
MMMA-3

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Subj:

REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION(S)

. 

-

A review of Mr.

and the records at this Headquarters fails to reveal

1.
records,
any documentation that he was injured under conditions for which
Therefore, it has
the Purple Heart Medal can be authorized.
been determined that he is not entitled to this award.

service and medical

The records also show that on January 22, 1957, this

2.
Headquarters provided him with a letter stating, that
regulations require that he obtain eyewitness statements.
eyewitness statements can be from the medical personnel who
treated him or two other personnel who were present at the time
he was injured.
medical attention received,
a direct result of enemy action.
required eyewitness statements, no further action can be taken.

Statements should contain the time, place,

The

and verification that the injury was
Since we have not received the

3.

A point of contact at MMMA is

@ 784-9206.

Military Awards Branch

nel Management Division

mmandant of the Marine Corps

c



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07949-99

    Original file (07949-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Military Awards Branch, Headquarters, Marine Corps, dated 27 April 2000, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02593-02

    Original file (02593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Our most recent reply is the Purple Heart Medal is not awarded for Combat Without the required two eyewitness statements to forwarded as enclosure (2). if he can provide the required two As previously stated, records fail to Without these : _. . ’ served in the Marine Corps, the During the perio Purple Heart was authorized for award to those who were wounded .as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United or injured States or an opposing armed force of a foreign county in which the.Armed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07427-00

    Original file (07427-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by the Awards Branch, Headquarters Marine a copy of which is attached. by an enemy of the United A review of his service and medical records, and the records 2. at this Headquarters fails to reveal any documentation to substantiate his entitlement to the Purple Heart award. the time, place, that the injury was a direct result of enemy action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04224-01

    Original file (04224-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VlRGlNlA 22134-510 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: ’ 165 0 MMMA-3 17SepOl MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) Subj: FOR ADVISORY OPINION(S) IN THE CASE OF FORMER MARINE Encl: (1) Copy of MMMA memo of 17 Sep 01 1. During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07733-00

    Original file (07733-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of his service and medical records, and the records at this Headquarters fails to reveal any documentation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05668-01

    Original file (05668-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, regulations and policies. VIRGINIA 22 134-6 103 S TO: IN REPLY.REFER 1650 MMMA-3 llDecO1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECT1 NAVAL RECORDS 3R, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF (BCNR) Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION FORMER MARINE Upon review of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03231-01

    Original file (03231-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 13 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. a review of his service and medical records, which would qualify him for the Purple Since there is no indication in the records that he was regulations require that he obtain eyewitness The eyewitness statements can be from the medical 3. injured under conditions, Heart award, statements. is accepted as one of the two required...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04425-01

    Original file (04425-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    YOU are entitled to have the Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221 34-51 03 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1650 MMMA-3 7AugOl MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06439-08

    Original file (06439-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 13 November 2008, a copy of which is attached. Statements should contain the time, place; medical attention received, and verification that the injury was a Girect result of enemy action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-01

    Original file (06639-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Copies of these replies are forwarded as Enclosure (3) is a copy of a letter forwarded 1993 regarding his entitlement to (1) and (2) _ During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple Heart 2. was authorized for award to those who were wounded or injured as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United States or an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United States was engaged. and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit...