DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
BIG
Docket No:
2 August 2001
660640
Dear Co
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 2 August 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures’
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated
25 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.
.material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. Since you were not considered for promotion to colonel, they found
that the HQMC Performance Evaluation Review Board action directing removal of the two
fitness reports from your record did not justify granting you remedial consideration -for
promotion. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
In this
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
copy to:
The Honorable James M. Jeffords
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221344104
IN REPLY REFER To:
1412/2
MMPR
25 May 01
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj
Ref:
OF LIEUTENANT COLONE
SM~R ( RET )
(a) MMER Route Sheet of 21 May 2001
(b) Title 10, U.S. Code
Reference (a) requested an advisor
1.
Lieutenant
requesting relief by a
Co1
Lieutenan t
Special Selection Board.
'
se of
2.
1963 and 1964 USMCR Colonel Promotion Selection Boards.
on the Inactive Status List.
thus not considered, for the
He was
s not eligible,
Section 628 of reference
3.
board shall be convened, by the Secretary concerned, for an
officer who is eligible for promotion and was not considered
because of administrative error.
not meet the requirements for a s
(b\) states that a special selection
herefore does
n board.
f contact in this matter is
Capta
Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps
Head, Promotion Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05329-01
Your last request was not considered, as you have not been selected for or promoted to lieutenant colonel. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has Date of Report Reportin gSenio r Period of Report 11 Apr 00 There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) to record and e FY02 USMC remove the To He successfully...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03811-01
If that action is not possible, then the petitioner (b) is the Reference \\ . " s the Reviewing Officer on those two reports, as he was Colonel that if Colone he would have so stated in his review. Further, we recommend that his request for a special selection board through BCNR be denied since he has not exhausted the appropriate administrative procedures for requesting a special selection board set forth in references (b) and (c) contact in this matter is Capt Head, Promotion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02041-01
Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the record and 02 USMC He petitioned the porting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990731. requests removal of his failures of selection. Performance Evaluation Review Board He failed selection He petitioned the (PERB) for removal of the rting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990630. equests removal of his failures of selection. Head, Personnel Management Support was removed from the OMPF on 5 October emphatically states that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05411-01
What is significant is that Colonel That matter not Subi: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ICATION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR USMC :current assessment of the performance recorded in the challenged fitness report is based observation." o e case of request for removal of Per the reference, we reviewed 2. petition. removed, the record would have been more competitive, but not enough to warrant removal of the failure of selection.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05821-01
(?O/ MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR (PERB) R - I USMC ._ (b) MC0 P1610.7D DD Form 149 of 3 May 01 w/Ch l-4 Per MC0 1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, 1. with three members present, Majo the fitness report for the period 970801 to 980519 (CH) was requested. Reference (a) requested an advisory opinion in the case...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05485-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS Y HEADQUARTERS 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 MMOA-4 10 Jul 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: (a) MMER Request of 09 Jul 01. in the case USMC Recommend approval of 1. of his failure of selection to Lieutenant Colonel. Lieutenant successfully petitioned the Performance Evaluation Review Board for removal of the Reviewing Officer co Transfer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07632-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, at enclosure (l), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 August 1999 to 7 April 2000, a copy of which is at Tab A to enclosure (1). In Petitioner ’s prior case, the HQMC Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMOA-4), the office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner ’s request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07123-01
In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to strike his failures of selection for promotion has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action. (3), this Headquarters provided Lieutenant th a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained at Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05333-01
directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has the Performance Evaluation Review Board Date of Keport Reporting Senior Period of Report 22 Jan 99 980801 to 981231 (CH) There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. review ailed + Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) to remove the Change of Reporting Senior Fitness Report for the period 980801 to 981231. equests...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04799-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that only the FY 1971 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, convened on 4 August 1970, could have seen either of the contested letters, and that this promotion board could have seen only the letter dated 11 June 1970. In this regard, the Board found your record also included...