DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No: 06436-00
14 June 2001
Dear Lieutenariiiiitveiniatinaae
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 29 November 2000 with
enclosures and 14 February 2001, and a memorandum for the record dated 5 June 2001,
copies of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinions. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosures
Copy to:
itp cma
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1611
Ser 834C/1103
29 Nov 00
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR,CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
RSa_SC, USNR , -eeieeiiiinsaierimiieia ts.
Ref: (a) BCNR memo 5420 PERS-O0OZCB of 3 Nov O00
(b) SECNAVINST 1420.1A
Encl: (1) BCNR file 06436-00
(2) CHNAVPERS ltr 1426 of 6 Jul 00
(3) Report of the Board of Inquiry ICO
L ai, sc, USNR
1. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations
concerning the removal 0 MMe: Oermanent promotion to
lieutenant. Enclosure (1) is returned as a matter under the
purview of BCNR.
2. Per reference (b), the Secretary of the Navy may remove the
name of an officer from a promotion list if the officer is
mentally, physically, morally, or professionally unqualified.
As indicated by enclosure (2), the Secretary was aware of all of
the issues that have been presented to the BCNR when he reviewed
RRREERRRIGE o 5 =. LT G_aiienaay was determined to be not
professionally qualified for permanent promotion to lieutenant.
3. The quoted statements from the senior Board member that were
provided by pene - incomplete and out of context. As
shown by enclosure (3), the senior member was e plaining the
Board of Inquiry's decision to retaix——— ies
counseling him to improve his performance in the future.
4. As this removal action was consistent with applicable
directives and the handling of similar cases, and the Secretary
of the Navy was aware of all the issues that have been presented
to the BCNR, I do not recommend relief be granted to LTJG
RAAT II matter.
Commander, U.S. Navy
Director, Personnel Performance &
Security Division (PERS-83)
Va
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
3720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1426
6 Jul 00
From:
TO:
Via:
Sub}: REMOVAL OF YOUR NAME FROM THE FY-99 ACTIVE LIEUTENANT
STAFF PROMOTION LIST io «=
Ref: (a) SECNAVINST, 1420.1A
Encl: (1) CHNAVPERS ltr 1421 of 10 Apr 00
1. You are hereby officially notified that the Secretary of the
Navy has removed your name from the FY-99 Active Lieutenant Staff
Promotion List per reference (a). Enclosure (1) pertains.
2. A copy of this letter and enclosure (1) will be filed in
your official record. Accordingly, you are afforded the
opportunity to comment on this information prior to its entry
into your official record. If you desire to comment on this
action, please forward your statement within fifteen days of
receipt of this letter.
y direction
cree a mee
"FINISH FILE PERS-834C FICHE 5"
Sf
B
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5000 " oT REFER TO
10 APR 2000
From: Chief of Naval Personnel
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REMOVAL OF PERMANENT PROMOTION TO LIEUTENANT ICO
Lijgm_—immirmerDs, SC, US
Ref: (a) oe INSS 1420.1A
‘a received nonjudicial punishment on
17 October 1998 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (eight
specifications), dereliction of duty. Specifically, while
sery as Sales Officer onboard USS NICHOLAS (FFG 47), :
siportthcowesss =: to notify the commanding officer of several
money shortages, including the theft of an undetermined amount of
money from a filing cabinet. eee also found to be
in violation of several requirements governing the management of
the Ship Retail Operations. BRERA eee © awarded a punitive
letter of reprimand. Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S.
Atlantic Fleet; Commander, Destroyer Squadron EIGHTEEN; and
Commanding Officer, USS NICHOLAS recommend NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07085-00
PERS-833 recommends disapproving Petitioner ’s request to remove the letter which removed his name from the promotion board report. ” e. In correspondence attached as enclosure PERS-06L6, the NPC Office of Legal Counsel, has commented that they recommend favorable action on Petitioner ’s request to have removed from his permanent record all reference to the NJP which has been set aside, but do not recommend favorable action on his request to remove the contested letter. c. Reference (b)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07117-00
Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. as a Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve since the date of his commission and therefore was never eligible for a date of rank adjustment. e Active Status List erved continuously activ Reserve...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07431-00
In addition, the Board considered the Navy Personnel Command the memorandum for the record dated 5 March 2001, and the NPC opinion dated 6 March 2001 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the PERS-85 advisory opinion dated 6 March 2001 in finding that your date of rank should not be adjusted because you would not have rated an adjustment when you came on active duty, had you requested one. r October 1996 of rank adjustment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06129-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd Docket No: 06129-00 20 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LCDR REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD c, us Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03894-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. become effective until 1 May 2000, LCD consideration under the new program. strange, in that all officers whose promotions are delayed due to failure of physical readiness tests are retained on active duty until they pass the test or twice fail to select for promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01679-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. The Board was likewise unable to find that the Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force denied your right to an interview with him; that he inadequately reviewed the DFC documentation; or that he wrongfully concurred with and forwarded the DFC recommendation. Since the Board found that the DFC and related fitness report should stand, they had no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01
~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07857-02
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 dtd 27 Aug 02 PERS-80 memo dtd 5 Sep 02 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing his ensign date of rank to 22 August 1998, his lieutenant junior grade date of rank and effective date to 22 August 2000, and his lieutenant date of rank and effective date to 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07693-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing her commander date of rank to restore her relative seniority in her officer community. They recommend adjusting her date of rank to 1 June 1998. The petitioner promoted to commander at the month point in keeping with her running mates and within flow point guidelines of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001
i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...